Paslaugų pastato su daugiafunkce sale ir papildomomis paslaugomis projektavimo dokumentacijos parengimas Zbuczyna

This tender for design documentation is generally well-structured, with clear documentation and a defined scope. However, the lack of disclosed value and specific evaluation criteria are notable drawbacks.

The tender adheres to general regulatory requirements with a proper CPV code and active status. The procedure type is not specified, which is a minor omission. Deadlines are present but could be considered tight given the scope.

The title and description clearly define the scope of work. The presence of a form template (SWZ) and various attachments indicates that requirements are documented, although specific evaluation criteria are missing.

Most basic information is present, including the title, reference, organization, and deadline. However, the estimated value is not disclosed, and the contract duration is not specified, impacting overall completeness.

The tender utilizes e-procurement, which promotes fairness. All documents appear to be accessible. The absence of disclosed value and specific evaluation criteria could be perceived as less transparent, but there are no overt signs of tailoring requirements to specific companies.

The tender is marked as e-procurement, which is positive. However, the lack of a disclosed contract start date and financing information limits practical assessment. The submission deadline might be tight.

Key fields such as title, reference, organization, and deadline are populated. There are no reported disputes or suspensions. The dates provided are logical within the context of an active tender.

There is no explicit mention of green procurement, social aspects, or innovation within the provided information. The tender does not indicate if it is EU funded.