Kompiuterinės įrangos ir programinės įrangos pirkimas ir pristatymas įgyvendinant projektą „Ivaņiskos seniūnijos kibernetinė savivalda“ (pakartotinis pirkimas 2)

This tender for computer equipment and software is active and EU-funded, with a clear CPV code and available documentation. However, it lacks disclosed financial value and specific evaluation criteria, impacting completeness and fairness.

The tender appears to comply with general legal requirements, including a proper CPV code and the indication of EU funding. The procedure is not explicitly stated but is implied to be a standard supply contract. No disputes are noted. The deadline, while short, is within a reasonable range for a repeat tender of this nature, though it could be tighter.

The title and description clearly indicate the subject of the procurement. The attached documents, including technical specifications and the SWZ, provide detailed information. However, the absence of specified evaluation criteria leaves a gap in clarity regarding how bids will be assessed.

Most basic information is present, including the title, reference, organization, and CPV code. The submission deadline is specified, and three relevant documents are attached. However, the estimated value is not disclosed, and crucial details like contract duration and financing information are missing, reducing overall completeness.

The tender is conducted via e-procurement, which promotes fairness. The availability of documents and the clear CPV code are positive. The lack of disclosed estimated value and specific evaluation criteria could be perceived as a slight disadvantage for potential bidders, but there are no overt signs of tailored requirements for specific companies.

The tender utilizes e-procurement, which is a positive aspect for practicality. However, the lack of explicit information regarding contract start date and financing details, along with the absence of a disclosed estimated value, makes it harder for bidders to fully assess the project's scope and their capacity to undertake it.

Key fields such as title, reference, organization, CPV code, and submission deadline are populated. There are no indications of suspension or disputes. The dates are logical, with the submission deadline occurring after the notice date. The 'repeat' nature of the tender suggests a prior iteration, but no issues arise from this.

The tender is marked as EU Funded, which often implies adherence to certain standards. However, there are no specific mentions of green procurement, social aspects, or innovation within the provided information, limiting the sustainability score.