Kvietimas teikti pasiūlymus valymo paslaugoms Chelmer Valley High School

This tender for cleaning services at Chelmer Valley High School is generally well-structured with clear objectives and a reasonable timeline. However, it lacks specific evaluation criteria and details on green procurement, impacting its overall quality.

The tender follows an open procedure and specifies a CPV code. Deadlines are provided, though the submission deadline might be considered tight by some. No disputes are indicated. The procedure appears compliant with standard procurement practices.

The description of services and aims is clear, outlining expectations for cleaning standards, quality assurance, and communication. The AI-extracted requirements further detail these aspects. However, the absence of specified evaluation criteria leaves some ambiguity on how bids will be assessed.

Most basic information is present, including title, reference, organization, estimated value, and contract duration. Key dates are provided. However, the lack of content for the tender documents means essential details for bidders are missing.

The tender is open, and the value is disclosed. The criteria, while not explicitly detailed for evaluation, appear objective in their description of service aims. The process is not explicitly e-procurement, which could be a minor drawback.

The tender includes a contract start date and duration. However, the lack of explicit mention of e-submission and the absence of financing information reduce its practicality for potential bidders.

Key fields such as title, reference, organization, value, and dates are populated. The timeline is logical, and there are no indications of suspension or disputes. The contract start date aligns with the duration and award timeline.

The tender does not explicitly mention green procurement, social aspects, or innovation. It is also not indicated as EU funded, which limits its sustainability score.