Partick Housing – Draudimo sutartis ir paslaugos

This tender for an insurance contract is generally well-structured with clear basic information and a disclosed value. However, it lacks specific details on evaluation criteria and submission requirements, impacting its overall completeness and practicality.

The tender adheres to basic legal requirements by specifying a CPV code, a clear procedure, and no reported disputes. Deadlines appear reasonable given the context. The absence of a reveal date is a minor procedural oversight.

The description of the insurance services is clear and specific, detailing the types of coverage required. The absence of explicit evaluation criteria is a notable omission that could lead to ambiguity.

Most essential information like title, reference, organization, value, and duration is present. However, the lack of detailed requirements for exclusion, eligibility, technical, financial, and submission aspects, along with no document content available, significantly reduces completeness.

The tender is open and uses e-procurement, promoting fairness. The value is disclosed, and criteria are objective in principle, though not explicitly stated. No requirements appear tailored to specific companies.

While e-procurement is indicated, the lack of explicit e-submission details and the absence of document content reduce practicality. Financing information and contract start date are not specified.

Key fields such as title, reference, organization, value, and deadline are populated logically. There are no reported suspensions or disputes, indicating good data consistency.

The tender does not explicitly mention green procurement, social aspects, or innovation. It is also not indicated as EU funded, suggesting a lack of focus on sustainability criteria.