Apsaugos paslaugos, įskaitant raktų saugojimą ir mobiliuosius patruliavimus

Overall, this tender presents a clear need for security services but suffers from significant data inconsistencies, particularly regarding the CPV code and estimated value, and lacks detailed evaluation criteria upfront. While basic information is provided, critical specifics are behind a registration wall, impacting clarity and fairness.

The tender uses an incorrect CPV code (security software development services) for physical security services, which is a significant legal compliance issue. Additionally, mandatory exclusion grounds are not explicitly detailed in the provided information, which is a concern. The procedure type is clearly defined, and no disputes are noted.

The general description of the services required is clear. However, the full requirements, specifications, and detailed evaluation criteria for the 50% quality component are not immediately available and require registration, which reduces upfront clarity for potential bidders.

Basic information such as title, reference, organization, deadlines, estimated value, duration, and location are provided. However, the tender is not fully complete as detailed specifications and comprehensive evaluation criteria are not immediately accessible, requiring bidders to register.

The estimated value is disclosed, the submission deadline is reasonable for preparation, and electronic submission is supported. However, requiring registration to access the full tender pack and the lack of detailed quality evaluation criteria upfront reduce transparency and could impact the fairness of the bidding process.

Electronic submission via a portal is supported, and key dates like contract start and duration are clearly specified. The estimated value is also provided. The absence of an explicit document URL in the initial information is a minor inconvenience, but the portal mention implies accessibility.

This tender suffers from significant data inconsistencies. The CPV code (security software development) is inconsistent with the service description (physical security services). Critically, the estimated value is stated as 780,000 EUR in the basic information but £650,000 in one of the documents, representing a discrepancy in both currency and amount. The 'Liable Person' field is also empty.

There is no mention of green procurement, social aspects, or innovation focus within the provided tender information. The tender is also not indicated as EU funded, which often correlates with higher sustainability standards.