Kvietimas teikti pasiūlymą dėl Astley Park žaidimo aikštelių gerinimo ir susijusių darbų

This tender for Astley Park Playing Pitch Improvements is generally well-structured with clear technical requirements and a disclosed estimated value. However, it lacks explicit evaluation criteria and details on submission procedures beyond the deadline.

The tender appears to comply with general procurement regulations for below-threshold open competitions. The CPV code is appropriate, and there are no immediate indications of disputes or regulatory non-compliance. Deadlines are provided, though their reasonableness is debatable given the scope.

The description of the works is detailed and specific, outlining the required improvements to the football pitches and associated infrastructure. Technical requirements are clearly articulated, referencing the FA Performance Quality Standard. However, the absence of specified evaluation criteria introduces ambiguity.

Most basic information is present, including title, reference, organization, estimated value, and contract duration. The description is comprehensive. However, the lack of accessible tender documents with content and the absence of detailed financial requirements for bidders limit completeness.

The tender is open, and the estimated value is disclosed, promoting transparency. The technical requirements are objective and based on industry standards (FA PQS). There are no apparent tailored requirements favouring specific companies. The use of e-procurement is implied but not explicitly stated as mandatory.

The tender specifies a contract start date and duration. However, the lack of explicit mention of e-submission and the absence of a direct URL for documents hinder practical access for potential bidders. Financing information is not detailed.

Key fields such as title, reference, organization, estimated value, and deadlines are populated. The dates provided (submission deadline, contract start) are logical and do not indicate any immediate inconsistencies. No disputes or suspensions are reported.

The tender does not explicitly mention any green procurement, social aspects, or innovation requirements. It is not indicated as EU funded, suggesting a lack of focus on these broader sustainability goals.