FM Smulkūs darbai (Tiekėjų sąrašas)

This tender for FM Minor Works (Supplier List) is generally well-structured, with clear Lot divisions and estimated values. However, it lacks specific details on evaluation criteria and submission requirements, impacting its overall completeness and practicality.

The tender appears to comply with basic legal requirements for open competition below the threshold. The CPV code is provided, and there are no reported disputes. The deadline, while active, is relatively short given the open competition nature, which could be a minor concern for some potential bidders.

The description of the works and the division into two lots is clear. Eligibility and technical capability requirements are broadly defined, indicating the need for specialist providers capable of delivering minor works within specified value ranges. However, the absence of specific evaluation criteria and detailed submission requirements reduces overall clarity.

Key information such as title, reference, organization, estimated value, contract duration, and start date are present. The CPV code is also provided. However, the lack of detailed submission requirements and the absence of content in the tender documents significantly reduce completeness.

The tender is an open competition, which promotes fairness. The division into lots allows for a broader range of suppliers to participate. The estimated value is disclosed, and the criteria, while not fully detailed, are based on capability and specialization. The lack of specific tailored requirements for individual companies is positive.

The tender is active and has a specified contract start date. However, the absence of information regarding e-submission and the lack of detailed submission requirements make the practical aspects of applying less straightforward. The availability of documents is noted, but their content is not accessible.

Key fields such as title, reference, organization, value, and dates are populated logically. There are no reported suspensions or disputes, and the dates provided are consistent. The tender status is active.

The tender does not explicitly mention any green procurement, social aspects, or innovation focus. It is also not indicated as EU funded, which limits its sustainability score.