Personalo atrankos konsultanto paslaugos

This tender for personnel selection consultant services is generally well-structured and compliant, with good clarity and data consistency. However, it lacks specific details on evaluation criteria and has restricted document access, impacting overall quality.

The tender follows a standard open procedure and has a proper CPV code. Deadlines appear reasonable. No explicit disputes are noted. Regulatory compliance is presumed given the structure, but specific details within the documents would confirm this.

The description is clear about the service required. The existence of 'Iepirkuma priekšmeta prasības' and 'Nolikums ar pielikumiem' suggests documented requirements, although the specific criteria are noted as missing.

Basic information like title, reference, organization, estimated value, and contract duration are present. However, the absence of explicitly stated evaluation criteria within the summary and the potential for restricted access to full documentation raises concerns about completeness.

The procedure is open, and the value is disclosed. The AI flags 'Restricted document access' as an issue, which can impact fairness if not all potential bidders can access necessary information. However, the core requirements of an open procedure and disclosed value are met.

The tender is marked as 'E-Procurement', which is positive. The contract duration is specified. However, the lack of explicit mention of e-submission as a method (though implied by e-procurement) and missing financing information reduces practicality.

Key fields such as title, reference, organization, and dates are populated logically. There are no reported suspensions or disputes, contributing to high data consistency.

The tender description and summary do not mention any explicit green procurement, social aspects, innovation focus, or EU funding, which limits the sustainability score. These aspects are not flagged as required.