Betoninė riedlenčių aikštelė ir ratų sporto aikštynas

This tender for a concrete skatepark is generally well-structured with clear basic information and a disclosed value. However, it lacks detailed documentation and explicit evaluation criteria, impacting its completeness and clarity.

The tender appears to comply with basic legal requirements for a below-threshold open competition. The CPV code is appropriate, and there are no reported disputes. The deadline, while potentially short, is specified. The absence of a reveal date is a minor procedural oversight.

The description of the project is clear and concise. However, the absence of specified evaluation criteria and the lack of content in the tender documents significantly reduce overall clarity for potential bidders.

Most basic information is present, including title, reference, organization, value, and deadlines. However, the critical omission of content within the tender documents means essential details for bidding are missing, impacting completeness.

The tender is an open competition, and the value is disclosed, promoting fairness. The criteria for eligibility and capability are mentioned as requirements, suggesting an objective approach. The lack of specific company tailoring is positive.

The tender specifies a contract start date and duration. However, the lack of information regarding e-submission and financing details limits its practicality for bidders.

Key fields such as title, reference, organization, value, and dates are populated logically. There are no reported suspensions or disputes, indicating good data consistency.

The tender does not explicitly mention any green procurement, social aspects, innovation focus, or EU funding, which are common in modern tenders. This indicates a lack of emphasis on sustainability.