TNCEA – Detalūs tyrimai biure dėl nesprogusios amunicijos Anglijos ekosistemos apklausai

This tender is in the planning stage and outlines a clear need for unexploded ordnance risk assessment studies. While generally well-defined, it lacks specific evaluation criteria and details on submission methods.

The tender is in a planning phase, which explains the absence of a formal procedure code. The CPV code is appropriate. Deadlines are provided, though the submission deadline appears very short given the planning status. No disputes are noted. Regulatory compliance is assumed but not explicitly detailed.

The description of the requirement for unexploded ordnance (UXO) risk assessment studies is clear and well-contextualized within the NCEA program. The scope of work and the nature of the sites are adequately described. However, evaluation criteria are missing, which impacts clarity on how bids will be assessed.

Basic information such as title, reference, organization, and description is present. The estimated value, contract duration, and start date are specified. However, the content of the tender documents is not available, and crucial details like evaluation criteria are missing.

The tender appears fair, with a disclosed (though nominal) value and objective technical requirements. The process is divided into parts, which can promote competition. There is no indication of requirements tailored to specific companies. The use of e-procurement is not explicitly stated but is implied by modern tender practices.

The contract start date is specified, and the duration is reasonable. Financing information is not detailed. The lack of explicit mention of e-submission and the absence of document URLs hinder practical access and submission.

Key fields such as title, reference, organization, and dates are populated. The tender status is 'planning', which is consistent with the lack of a formal procedure. No suspension or disputes are noted, and the dates provided are logical within the context of a planning phase.

There is no explicit mention of green procurement, social aspects, or innovation within the tender description. The tender is not indicated as EU funded.