KOMUNIKACIJOS-Šeimos advokatūros paslauga mirusiųjų šeimoms po mirties įkalinimo įstaigoje

The tender offers a clear objective and estimated value for a socially relevant service, but lacks detailed documentation and specific evaluation criteria, impacting overall completeness and practicality.

The tender adheres to open procedure and specifies a CPV code. Deadlines appear reasonable given the context. No immediate disputes are noted. Regulatory compliance is assumed based on the government entity.

The description of the Family Advocacy Service is clear and well-articulated, highlighting the essential principles and aims. The stated eligibility requirements are understandable, though technical requirements are absent.

Key information such as title, organization, value, and deadline are present. However, crucial documents are not available for review, and essential details like contract duration and specific submission requirements are missing.

The tender utilizes e-procurement and discloses the estimated value, promoting transparency. Criteria appear objective based on the description, and the procedure is open. No tailoring to specific companies is evident.

The e-procurement characteristic is noted, but the absence of a direct document URL and specific submission guidelines hinders practical assessment. Financing information and contract start date are not provided.

Key fields like title, organization, value, and deadline are populated logically. The tender status is active with no recorded disputes or suspensions, indicating consistent data.

The tender description does not explicitly mention green procurement, social aspects beyond the service itself, or innovation. This suggests a moderate approach to sustainability criteria.