Deratizacijos ir dezinfekcijos paslaugų teikimas Jelgavos savivaldybės įstaigose

This tender for deratization and disinsection services in Jelgava Municipality is generally well-structured, with clear basic information and a reasonable timeline. However, it suffers from restricted document access and a lack of specified evaluation criteria, impacting transparency and potentially fairness.

The tender adheres to basic legal requirements with a clear procedure, proper CPV code, and no reported disputes. Deadlines appear reasonable. The primary concern is the restricted access to crucial tender documents, which could hinder full legal compliance for potential bidders.

The core service description is clear. However, the detailed requirements for exclusion, eligibility, technical, and submission are deferred to external documents, which are not fully accessible. The absence of explicitly stated evaluation criteria also reduces overall clarity.

Most basic information is present, including estimated value, contract duration, and deadlines. However, the completeness is compromised by the inaccessibility of key documents ('Iepirkuma priekšmeta prasības, 1.versija', 'Nolikums ar pielikumiem') which are essential for understanding the full scope and requirements.

The tender is conducted via e-procurement, and the estimated value is disclosed, contributing to fairness. However, the restricted access to essential documentation and the lack of specified evaluation criteria raise concerns about a level playing field for all potential bidders.

The tender utilizes e-procurement, which is a positive aspect. However, the practicality is diminished by the restricted access to necessary documents, making it difficult for bidders to prepare a comprehensive submission. The contract start date is not explicitly mentioned.

Key fields such as title, reference, organization, estimated value, and deadlines are populated consistently. There are no reported suspensions or disputes, and the dates appear logical within the tender lifecycle.

The tender does not explicitly mention any green procurement, social aspects, or innovation focus. It is also not indicated as EU funded, suggesting a limited emphasis on sustainability criteria.