Bendrųjų statybinių medžiagų tiekimas

This tender seeks a supplier for general building materials with clear operational requirements but lacks detailed evaluation criteria and digital submission options.

The tender follows an open procedure and specifies a CPV code. Deadlines appear reasonable given the estimated value. However, the absence of a reveal date for submissions and unclear regulatory context for the specific jurisdiction prevent a higher score.

The description of required services (supply and delivery of general building materials for reactive and planned works) is clear. Eligibility and technical capability requirements are logically derived from the description. The absence of evaluation criteria is the main detractor.

Key information such as title, reference, organization, estimated value, contract duration, and start date are present. However, the lack of content for the tender documents and absence of specified evaluation criteria mean essential information is missing for bidders.

The tender is open to all suppliers, has a disclosed value, and the criteria are based on general capabilities rather than specific company pre-qualifications. However, the lack of documented evaluation criteria makes it harder for bidders to understand how their submissions will be judged, potentially impacting perceived fairness.

The tender specifies a contract start date and duration. However, the lack of e-submission is a significant practical drawback, requiring manual submission. Financing information is not detailed, and the provision of document URLs is not explicitly stated.

All key fields such as title, reference, organization, value, and timeline are populated logically. There are no noted disputes or suspensions. The contract start date follows the submission deadline.

The tender does not explicitly mention any green procurement, social aspects, or innovation requirements, nor is it indicated as EU funded, which limits the score in this category.