Daugiadalykių inžinerinių konsultacijų paslaugų sutartis

This tender for multidisciplinary engineering consultancy services is generally well-structured, with clear basic information and a reasonable estimated value. However, it lacks detail in key areas such as evaluation criteria and specific submission requirements, impacting its overall completeness and practicality.

The tender adheres to open procedure and provides a CPV code. Deadlines are specified, and there are no reported disputes. The estimated value is within reasonable limits for the contract duration. The absence of a reveal date is a minor procedural oversight.

The title and description clearly outline the procurement's purpose. The CPV code is appropriate. However, the lack of specified evaluation criteria and detailed submission requirements leaves room for ambiguity regarding how bids will be assessed and what is expected from applicants.

Essential information like title, reference, organization, estimated value, and deadlines are present. The contract duration and start date are also specified. However, the absence of detailed requirements for exclusion, eligibility, technical, financial, and submission aspects, along with no document content available, significantly reduces completeness.

The tender uses an open procedure, which promotes fairness. The estimated value is disclosed, and the deadline, while potentially short, is not excessively so. The lack of specific tailored requirements for companies is a positive. However, the absence of clear evaluation criteria could lead to subjective assessments.

The tender specifies a contract start date and duration. However, the lack of information regarding e-submission and the absence of document content make it less practical for potential bidders to fully engage with the process. Financing information is not explicitly detailed.

Key fields such as title, reference, organization, value, and dates are populated logically. There are no reported suspensions or disputes, and the dates provided are consistent with each other. The tender status is active.

The tender does not explicitly mention any green procurement, social aspects, or innovation focus. It is also not indicated as EU funded, which limits its sustainability score.