Prisijunkite, kad galėtumėte naudoti laimėjimo strategijos rekomendacijas.
PrisijungtiAtnaujinkite, kad matytumėte, kurios įmonės greičiausiai pateiks pasiūlymą šiam konkursui, remiantis istoriniais viešųjų pirkimų duomenimis.
Prisijungti15 reikalavimų 5 kategorijose
Prisiregistruokite, kad peržiūrėtumėte visus reikalavimus ir analizę
Šiam konkursui nėra apdorotų dokumentų.
Dokumentai čia pasirodys, kai tik jie bus atsisiųsti ir išanalizuoti.
This tender for Service Wing Demolition (RAAC) is generally well-structured with clear technical requirements and a disclosed estimated value. However, it lacks explicit evaluation criteria and details on document content, impacting completeness and fairness.
The tender follows an open procedure and specifies a CPV code. Deadlines are provided, though the submission deadline might be considered tight given the complexity. Regulatory compliance is implied through the mention of PPN 03/24. No disputes are reported.
The description of works is detailed, outlining the scope from RIBA stage 4 to completion, including demolition, refurbishment, and new road construction within a live hospital environment. Requirements are documented, but evaluation criteria are missing, which affects overall clarity.
Most basic information is present, including title, organization, estimated value, and contract duration/start. However, the content of the tender documents is not available, and evaluation criteria are not specified, leaving gaps in completeness.
The tender uses the Common Assessment Standard, promoting a degree of standardization. The estimated value is disclosed, and the procedure is open. However, the lack of specified evaluation criteria could lead to subjective assessments. The requirement for specific language submissions might be a barrier for some, but it's not company-specific.
The tender specifies a contract start date and duration. Financing information is indirectly mentioned through the NHS England New Hospitals Programme. However, the absence of explicit e-submission details and the lack of document URLs reduce practicality.
Key fields such as title, reference, organization, value, and dates are populated. There are no reported suspensions or disputes. The dates provided are logical within the context of the tender.
The tender does not explicitly mention green procurement, social aspects, or innovation. It is noted as not being EU funded, which might limit the integration of certain sustainability criteria often promoted by EU funding.
Prisiregistruokite, kad peržiūrėtumėte visus reikalavimus ir analizę
Nereikia kreditinės kortelės • Sąranka per 2 minutes
Mūsų viešųjų pirkimų ekspertai parengia viską. Įrodytas sprendimas — jūs peržiūrit, patvirtinate ir pateikiate.
Sveiki! Aš esu jūsų AI asistentas, skirtas šiam konkursui. Galiu padėti jums suprasti reikalavimus, terminus, tinkamumo kriterijus ir pateikti strateginių įžvalgų.
Nereikia kreditinės kortelės