Greitkeliai - A6 greitkelio drenažo apklausa

This tender for a highways drainage survey is generally well-structured, with clear objectives and a defined scope. However, it lacks specific evaluation criteria and details on submission procedures, impacting its overall completeness and practicality.

The tender adheres to standard open procedure requirements and specifies a relevant CPV code. Deadlines appear reasonable for the scope, and no disputes are noted. Regulatory compliance is assumed based on the provided information.

The description of the survey and assessment services is clear, outlining the need for a baseline survey, cleansing of at-risk assets, and the development of a risk-based model. Eligibility and technical requirements are logically derived from the description.

Key information such as title, reference, organization, estimated value, contract duration, and start date are present. However, the absence of specific submission requirements and detailed evaluation criteria leaves gaps.

The tender is open, and the estimated value is disclosed. Requirements are based on the service description, suggesting objective criteria. The lack of specific company tailoring is positive. Access to full documents is assumed to be available through the platform.

While the contract start date and duration are specified, the lack of explicit e-submission details and the absence of information regarding financing make it less practical. The availability of documents is implied but not explicitly detailed with URLs.

Key fields such as title, reference, organization, value, and dates are populated consistently. There are no reported disputes or suspensions, and the dates provided are logical.

The tender does not explicitly mention any green procurement, social aspects, innovation, or EU funding, which are common considerations in modern tenders.