Norite dalyvauti viešuosiuose pirkimuose? Žiūrėkite mūsų TaaS konkursų rengimo paslaugą
Atgal į konkursus

PHD strateginio kainodaros, bilietų ir paklausos tyrimas

Atviras
Galutinis terminas
Liko 26 dienų
2026 m. rugsėjo 11 d.
Informacija apie sutartį
Kategorija
Open Procedure
Nuoroda
075910-2026
Vertė
£72,000
Vieta
United Kingdom, Jungtinė Karalystė
Paskelbta
2026 m. rugpjūčio 8 d.
Organizacija
CPV kodas
Projekto grafikas

Konkursas paskelbtas

2026 m. rugpjūčio 10 d.

Klausimų pateikimo terminas

2026 m. rugsėjo 4 d.

Pasiūlymų pateikimo terminas

2026 m. rugsėjo 11 d.

Sutarties pradžios data

2026 m. spalio 18 d.

Biudžetas
£72,000
Trukmė
6 mėnesių
Vieta
United Kingdom
Tipas
Open Procedure

Originalus konkurso aprašymas

PHD has identified a need for specialist expertise to address several strategic questions that cannot be answered internally with sufficient confidence. Existing evidence suggests pricing, admissions structure and visitor decision-making are affecting demand and conversion. However, the organisation requires independent analysis and modelling to understand: • Whether current pricing levels suppress demand. • How visitor segments respond to price and product structure. • The impact of removing lower-commitment admission products. • The relationship between yield, volume and long-term sustainability. • The role of digital channels in visitor conversion. • How future ticketing structures can support both commercial performance and audience growth. Deliverables • The commission is expected to produce: • A recommended admissions architecture. • A recommended pricing framework. • Recommendations regarding lower-priced entry products. • Recommendations regarding Gift Aid. • Recommendations regarding discounting. • Recommendations regarding affiliate, trade and third-party sales. • A practical implementation roadmap for Easter 2027. Procurement Structure An open competitive procurement exercise will be undertaken. Potential suppliers will be invited to submit proposals detailing: • Understanding of the brief. • Proposed methodology. • Relevant experience. • Project team. • Cost proposal. • Delivery timetable. Submissions will be evaluated against: • Understanding of strategic challenge. • Methodology and robustness. • Relevant expertise. • Practical applicability. • Value for money. • Quality of proposed team. Consortium bids are welcomed where they bring together complementary expertise across pricing strategy, behavioural insight, visitor research, digital analytics and commercial implementation. One organisation should be identified as lead contractor and assume overall responsibility for delivery. Contract Management The contract will be managed by the Head of Audiences and Revenue Marketing (Racheal Brasier) with support from Sharna Bennett (Performance and CRM Lead). Regular project meetings will be held throughout delivery. Key milestone outputs will be reviewed by an internal project steering group representing: • Portsmouth Historic Dockyard Operations with representation from MRT and RNM Contract Duration 18 months The core consultancy work is expected to complete within approximately 6-9 months, with the remaining term allowing for validation, implementation support and follow-up advice as required. Contract Value The estimated contract value is between £60,000 and £120,000 excluding VAT, based on the indicative project scale identified through an initial document sent out to potential suppliers. Initial market research was undertaken with a variety of suppliers that outlined different approaches to the work - the estimates provided ranged from £60,000 - £120,000. Funding is expected to be met from approved budgets and supports long-term commercial growth priorities for both RNM and MRT. Failure to undertake the study may result in: • Continued suppression of visitor demand. • Reduced accessibility for key audience segments. • Inefficient pricing structures. • Lost admissions income. • Poor strategic decision-making based on incomplete evidence. • Failure to optimise the balance between revenue generation and audience growth. Supplier Suitability Assessment Suppliers will be assessed against: • Understanding of the strategic challenge (15%). • Methodology and approach (15%). • Relevant experience and expertise (15%). • Project team quality (15%). • Deliverability and practical recommendations (15%). • Value for money (15%). • Sustainability (10%) Evaluation criteria reflect those outlined in the commission brief. Full details can be found within the scope document.

Rizikos analizė

Rizikos analizė dar nepasiekiama šios šalies konkursams. Šiuo metu palaikomos: Estija, Latvija, Lietuva, Lenkija, Prancūzija, Jungtinė Karalystė, Danija, Nyderlandai, Norvegija ir Suomija.

Laimėjimo strategija

Gaukite dirbtinio intelekto parengtą laimėjimo strategiją, pritaikytą šiam konkursui. Apima laimėjimo tikimybės balą, pagrindines galimybes ir iššūkius, rekomenduojamas pasiūlymo sritis, konkurencinės padėties analizę ir praktinius patarimus jūsų galimybėms maksimizuoti.

Prisijungti

Konkurentai

Atnaujinkite, kad matytumėte, kurios įmonės greičiausiai pateiks pasiūlymą šiam konkursui, remiantis istoriniais viešųjų pirkimų duomenimis.

Prisijungti

Reikalavimai ir kvalifikacija

Dirbtinis intelektas išrenka ir susistemina visus reikalavimus iš konkurso dokumentų — privalomus kvalifikacinius reikalavimus, technines specifikacijas, finansines sąlygas ir pateikimo taisykles — aiškiai suskirstytus, kad tiksliai žinotumėte, ko reikia pasiūlymui pateikti.

Prisijungti

Pagrindiniai reikalavimai

  • Company registration in EU required
  • Proven track record in similar projects
  • Financial stability documentation

Dokumentai

Yra 3 dokumentų su AI santraukomis

OCDS RecordDOC
075910-2026_ocds_record.json

Šiam dokumentui santrauka nepateikta.

OCDS Release PackageDOC
075910-2026_ocds_release.json

Šiam dokumentui santrauka nepateikta.

Official PDF VersionPDF
075910-2026_official.pdf

Šiam dokumentui santrauka nepateikta.

Dokumentų peržiūra

Prisiregistruokite, kad peržiūrėtumėte dokumentų santraukas ir analizę

Kokybės įvertinimas

Išsami konkurso kokybės analizė, vertinanti teisinę atitiktį, aiškumą, išsamumą, sąžiningumą, praktiškumą, duomenų nuoseklumą ir tvarumą 0–100 skalėje su detalia analize ir rekomendacijomis.

Prisijungti

Įtraukti į „Pipeline“