Upelio kranto, esančio prie Potok gatvės Leszna Górnoje, renovacija ir sutvirtinimas

This tender for stream bank reinforcement is generally well-structured, with clear technical requirements and available documentation. However, the lack of disclosed financial value and specific evaluation criteria slightly impacts its completeness and fairness.

The tender adheres to general legal compliance by providing a CPV code and a clear procedure. Deadlines appear reasonable for the scope, though not explicitly stated as 'reasonable' by the system. No disputes are indicated. The procedure is not explicitly defined as 'none' but rather lacks a specific code, which is a minor ambiguity.

The description of the works is clear, and the technical requirements for boulder size and concrete filling are well-documented. The criteria for evaluation are not explicitly stated, which is a point of concern for clarity.

Most basic information is present, including title, organization, and a deadline. However, the estimated value is not disclosed, and the contract duration is not specified, impacting the completeness of the financial and temporal aspects.

The tender promotes fairness through e-procurement and the availability of all documents. The technical requirements are specific but do not appear to be tailored to a single company. The lack of disclosed value and evaluation criteria could be perceived as a minor fairness concern.

The tender specifies e-procurement, which enhances practicality. However, the absence of a direct document URL for submission and the lack of financing information reduce its overall practicality for potential bidders.

Key fields such as title, reference, organization, and deadline are populated. There are no indications of suspension or disputes. The dates provided are logical within the context of a tender.

There is no explicit mention of green procurement, social aspects, or innovation within the tender documents. This suggests a lack of focus on sustainability criteria.