160 000,00 £

This tender provides a clear service description but suffers from significant gaps in formal procurement documentation, particularly regarding procedure type and evaluation criteria, impacting fairness and completeness.

The absence of a clearly defined procurement procedure type is a significant legal oversight, even for a 'planning' status. While CPV codes are correct and no disputes are noted, this fundamental omission impacts the tender's legal robustness.

The service description is clear, but the lack of explicit evaluation criteria, mandatory exclusion grounds, and financial requirements for bidders creates ambiguity and makes it difficult for potential providers to formulate a compliant and competitive offer.

Basic information like title, organization, value, and duration are present. However, the critical absence of evaluation criteria, a defined procedure type, and comprehensive bidder requirements (exclusion, financial) indicates significant incompleteness in the formal tender documentation.

The most significant fairness concern is the complete absence of evaluation criteria, which introduces subjectivity into the selection process. The lack of e-submission also creates a barrier to equal access for all potential bidders. Requirements themselves do not appear tailored.

The tender provides key practical dates like contract start and duration. However, the stated lack of e-submission is a notable practical drawback in modern procurement, potentially complicating the submission process for bidders.

Most core data fields are consistent and logical. However, the 'Type' and 'Procedure' fields are unpopulated ('None'), and the 'Liable Person' is missing, which are minor inconsistencies in the overall data structure.

The tender makes no explicit mention of green procurement, social aspects beyond the core service (animal welfare), or innovation. This indicates a missed opportunity to incorporate broader sustainability objectives into the procurement process.