Atvirasis nardymo paslaugų pagrindų susitarimas 2026 (FWA 1)

This tender for Diving Services Open Framework 2026 is generally well-structured, with clear objectives and a defined scope. However, it lacks specific details on evaluation criteria and relies heavily on separate tender documentation for crucial information.

The tender adheres to open procedure and provides a CPV code. Deadlines are present, though the submission deadline might be considered tight given the complexity implied by the framework structure. No disputes are noted. Regulatory compliance is assumed but not explicitly detailed.

The description of services is clear, outlining the need for scientific divers and support for habitat monitoring. Requirements are generally documented, but specific evaluation criteria are missing, and further details are deferred to the ITT documentation.

Basic information such as title, reference, organization, estimated value, and deadlines are present. The contract duration and start date are specified. However, the lack of content in the tender documents and the reliance on external ITT documentation for key requirements reduce completeness.

The framework structure with re-opening at intervals promotes ongoing competition. The value is disclosed, and the procedure is open. Criteria are not explicitly detailed, but the structure suggests objective evaluation will occur. E-procurement is not explicitly mentioned as a requirement.

The contract start date and duration are provided. Financing information is not detailed. The primary concern is the lack of explicit mention of e-submission and the reliance on external documentation, which can hinder practical access and submission.

Key fields like title, reference, organization, value, and deadlines are populated. There are no reported disputes or suspensions. The dates provided are logical and consistent with a framework agreement structure.

There is no explicit mention of green procurement, social aspects, or innovation. The tender is not indicated as EU funded. This suggests a lack of focus on sustainability criteria.