Prisijunkite, kad galėtumėte naudoti laimėjimo strategijos rekomendacijas.
PrisijungtiAtnaujinkite, kad matytumėte, kurios įmonės greičiausiai pateiks pasiūlymą šiam konkursui, remiantis istoriniais viešųjų pirkimų duomenimis.
Prisijungti14 reikalavimų 5 kategorijose
Prisiregistruokite, kad peržiūrėtumėte visus reikalavimus ir analizę
Yra 5 dokumentų su AI santraukomis
This document is a login page and cookie policy for the ProContract procurement portal, guiding users on registration, login, and cookie usage.
Cambridge City Council seeks an experienced Principal Contractor for the re-build and sympathetic repair of a 12m section of a Listed west wall at St Andrew the Less Churchyard, aiming for a long-lasting, cost-effective solution.
This document is an Open Contracting Data Standard (OCDS) release package providing machine-readable tender information from Cambridge City Council for the St Andrew the Less churchyard wall repair.
Cambridge City Council seeks an experienced Principal Contractor for the sympathetic repair and rebuild of a listed wall at St Andrew the Less Churchyard, with submissions due by March 13, 2026, evaluated 70% on quality and 30% on price.
This tender seeks an experienced Principal Contractor for Cambridge City Council to rebuild and sympathetically repair a 12m section of a listed churchyard wall, aiming for a long-lasting, cost-effective solution.
Prisiregistruokite, kad peržiūrėtumėte dokumentų santraukas ir analizę
This tender provides clear basic information and requirements for a specialized construction project. However, the lack of detailed evaluation criteria for the significant quality component (70%) is a notable deficiency, impacting transparency and fairness.
The tender clearly defines the procedure type as open and below threshold, and the CPV code is appropriate. No disputes are reported, and mandatory exclusion grounds are referenced. A minor detail is the missing procedure code.
The project description and technical requirements are clear and unambiguous. However, the specific criteria for evaluating the 70% quality component are not detailed, which significantly reduces overall clarity for bidders.
Basic information, deadlines, value, and duration are all specified. Requirements are outlined, but the absence of detailed evaluation criteria for the 70% quality component makes the tender incomplete regarding how bids will be truly assessed.
The value is disclosed, and e-procurement via a portal is supported. However, the lack of detailed quality evaluation criteria for 70% of the score significantly compromises the objectivity and transparency of the evaluation process, potentially leading to subjective decisions.
Electronic submission is supported via the ProContract portal, and the contract start date and duration are known. The absence of a direct document URL is a minor practical inconvenience.
The data provided is largely consistent and logical, with no reported disputes and coherent dates. The only minor inconsistency is the missing procedure code.
The tender does not explicitly include green procurement, social aspects, or innovation focus. While the project aims for a 'long-lasting' repair, it's not framed within a broader sustainability context.
Prisiregistruokite, kad peržiūrėtumėte visus reikalavimus ir analizę
Nereikia kreditinės kortelės • Sąranka per 2 minutes
Sveiki! Aš esu jūsų AI asistentas, skirtas šiam konkursui. Galiu padėti jums suprasti reikalavimus, terminus, tinkamumo kriterijus ir pateikti strateginių įžvalgų.
Nereikia kreditinės kortelės