FIN25219 Valymo ir apsaugos paslaugos, Fleet Walk prekybos centras

This tender for cleaning and security services provides a clear description and essential details but is significantly hampered by the complete absence of evaluation criteria, inaccessible key documents, and a lack of e-submission, which collectively undermine transparency and fairness.

The tender defines the procedure type and has no disputes. However, the missing reveal date, incomplete CPV codes (missing for security services), and the failure to provide access to a key document (Lot L-1) are notable compliance shortcomings regarding transparency and full disclosure.

While the service description is clear and the tender is split into logical lots, the complete absence of evaluation criteria is a critical flaw. Furthermore, the reliance on an unprovided "Part 2 Specification" and the lack of detailed mandatory exclusion grounds significantly reduce the overall clarity for bidders.

Basic information like title, organization, value, and deadlines are present. However, the tender is incomplete due to the failure to download "Document 1: Lot L-1," the absence of the "Part 2 Specification" content, and critically, the complete omission of evaluation criteria.

The tender's fairness is severely compromised by the complete lack of evaluation criteria, which prevents objective assessment and transparency. Additionally, the failure to provide full document access (Lot L-1) and the absence of e-submission create significant barriers and unequal access for potential bidders.

The tender clearly specifies contract duration and start date. However, the lack of electronic submission capabilities is a significant practical drawback. The inability to access a key document (Lot L-1) also creates practical difficulties for bidders in preparing their proposals.

Key dates are logical and consistent, and there are no reported disputes. Minor inconsistencies include unpopulated fields for the liable person and specific procedure codes, as well as a missing CPV code for security services.

The tender shows a very low focus on sustainability, with no explicit mention of green procurement, social criteria, or innovation aspects. It is also not EU funded, which often correlates with higher sustainability standards.