The Misbourne School maitinimo paslaugų konkursas

This tender offers a clear description and basic information but lacks detailed requirements and evaluation criteria, impacting its completeness and fairness. The financial value is unusually low, and sustainability aspects are not addressed.

The tender has a clear procedure (Competitive flexible procedure) and a specified CPV code. Deadlines are provided, though the submission deadline might be considered short relative to the contract start date. No disputes are reported. Regulatory compliance is assumed but not explicitly detailed.

The description of the service (school catering) and the organization is clear. However, the absence of specific eligibility, technical, financial, and submission requirements makes the overall clarity of what is expected from bidders moderate.

Basic information such as title, reference, organization, and CPV code is present. The estimated value, duration, and deadlines are specified. However, the lack of detailed requirements and attached documents with content significantly reduces completeness.

The tender provides access to basic information and discloses the value. The criteria for evaluation are not specified, which could lead to perceived unfairness. The absence of specific requirements means it's not tailored to specific companies, which is positive for fairness. The low value might be a point of concern for potential bidders.

The contract start date is clearly indicated. However, the lack of information regarding e-submission and the extremely low estimated value may hinder practical participation for many potential suppliers. The duration is specified.

Key fields like title, reference, organization, CPV, and dates are populated. There are no reported suspensions or disputes. The contract start date and submission deadline are logically placed, although the deadline is very close to the start date.

There is no mention of green procurement, social aspects, or innovation. The tender is not indicated as EU funded. This suggests a lack of focus on sustainability criteria.