Liftų modernizavimo daugiadalykės konsultacijos

This tender for lift modernization consultancy is generally well-structured with clear basic information and a reasonable estimated value. However, it lacks crucial details regarding evaluation criteria and document content, impacting its overall quality.

The tender appears to comply with basic legal requirements, including a clear CPV code and a specified procedure. Deadlines are provided, and there are no reported disputes. The 'Below threshold - open competition' procedure suggests adherence to relevant regulations for its value.

The title and description are clear, specifying the service and location. Mandatory exclusion grounds, eligibility, technical, financial, and submission requirements are listed, indicating a structured approach. However, the absence of specified evaluation criteria is a significant clarity issue.

Most basic information is present, including title, reference, organization, description, estimated value, and contract duration/start. However, the lack of accessible tender documents with content or summaries severely hinders completeness.

The tender is an open competition, suggesting fairness. The value is disclosed, and the procedure is not overly restrictive. There are no immediate indications of requirements tailored to specific companies. The use of e-procurement is implied but not explicitly stated as mandatory.

The contract start date and duration are specified. Financing information is not explicitly detailed, and the lack of explicit e-submission is a drawback. The availability of documents is questionable due to the lack of content.

Key fields such as title, reference, organization, value, and dates are populated logically. There are no reported disputes or suspensions, and the timeline appears consistent.

The tender does not explicitly mention green procurement, social aspects, or innovation. It is also not indicated as EU funded, suggesting a limited focus on sustainability criteria.