Legionelos rizikos vertinimo pagrindų sutartis

This tender for Legionella Risk Assessments is generally well-structured with clear objectives and financial information. However, it lacks specific evaluation criteria and detailed document content, impacting its overall practicality and completeness.

The tender follows an open procedure, has a clear CPV code, and no reported disputes. Deadlines appear reasonable given the scope. Regulatory compliance is assumed but not explicitly detailed.

The description of services required is clear, outlining the scope of work and the types of premises. However, the absence of specified evaluation criteria makes it difficult for bidders to fully understand how their submissions will be assessed.

Basic information such as title, reference, organization, estimated value, and duration are present. However, the lack of accessible document content and the absence of specified evaluation criteria reduce its completeness.

The tender is open, and the estimated value is disclosed. The criteria for eligibility and technical capability are mentioned as requirements, suggesting an objective approach. The lack of specific evaluation criteria is a minor concern for fairness.

The tender specifies a contract start date and duration. However, the absence of e-submission details and the lack of accessible document content limit its practicality for potential bidders.

Key fields such as title, reference, organization, value, and dates are populated. There are no reported suspensions or disputes, and the dates are logically sequenced.

The tender does not explicitly mention green procurement, social aspects, or innovation. It is also not indicated as EU funded, limiting its sustainability score.