Sutartis dėl Swansea Bay viešųjų ryšių kampanijos 2026/27

This tender for a PR campaign offers a clear description and good data consistency, but lacks detailed evaluation criteria and explicit sustainability considerations.

The tender appears to comply with general procurement regulations, with a clear CPV code and open competition procedure. Deadlines are provided, though the submission deadline might be considered tight given the scope. No disputes are noted. The procedure is 'Below threshold - open competition', which implies certain regulatory relaxations but still requires adherence to core principles.

The description of the 'Visit Swansea Bay' campaign, its objectives, and the two key strands (general promotion and cultural tourism) is well-articulated. The target audience and desired outcomes are reasonably clear. However, the absence of specified evaluation criteria hinders full clarity on how bids will be assessed.

Most basic information is present, including title, reference, organization, estimated value, duration, and start date. The CPV code is provided. However, the tender documents themselves are not accessible or summarized, which is a significant omission for completeness. The value is disclosed, but the currency is EUR while the budget is stated in GBP, which could cause confusion.

The tender is an open competition, promoting fairness. The value is disclosed, and the process is generally objective. The requirement for bidders to review existing campaign materials is reasonable. There is no indication of requirements tailored to specific companies, which is positive.

The tender specifies a contract start date and duration. Financing information is partially provided with a maximum budget, though the currency discrepancy needs clarification. The lack of explicit mention of e-submission and the unavailability of document URLs reduce practicality.

Key fields such as title, reference, organization, value, and dates are populated. There are no reported disputes or suspensions. The dates provided are logical within the context of the tender. The currency mismatch between the estimated value and the stated budget is a minor inconsistency.

The tender does not explicitly mention any green procurement, social aspects, innovation focus, or EU funding. This suggests a lack of emphasis on these important modern procurement considerations.