Rajono kelio 4716E Rzepisko - Ludwinów modernizavimas

This tender for road modernization is generally well-structured with clear technical requirements and available documentation. However, it lacks crucial financial details and explicit evaluation criteria, impacting completeness and fairness.

The tender appears to comply with general procurement regulations, including a proper CPV code and active status. The deadline, while potentially short, is clearly stated. No disputes are indicated. The primary concern is the lack of explicit evaluation criteria, which is a regulatory requirement in many jurisdictions.

The description of the road modernization work is detailed and specific, outlining the scope of repairs and materials. The technical requirements are clearly extracted from the description. The CPV code is appropriate for the described works.

Most basic information is present, including title, reference, organization, and a detailed description of works. However, the estimated value is not disclosed, and information regarding contract duration and financing is missing, which are essential for a complete understanding of the tender.

The tender is conducted via e-procurement, promoting accessibility. The requirements are technical and appear objective, not tailored to specific companies. However, the non-disclosure of the estimated value and the absence of explicit evaluation criteria could be perceived as a lack of transparency, potentially impacting fairness.

The tender specifies e-procurement, which is a positive aspect. However, the absence of a direct URL for document submission and the lack of information on the contract start date and financing reduce its practicality for potential bidders.

Key fields such as title, reference, organization, and deadline are populated. The CPV code is relevant. There are no indications of suspension or disputes. The dates provided are logical within the context of an active tender.

The tender description does not mention any specific green procurement, social aspects, or innovation requirements. It is not indicated as EU-funded, suggesting a lack of explicit sustainability focus.