Skip to main content
Retour aux appels d'offres

Reconstruction de canalisations d'égout par la méthode CIPP

Ouvert
Date limite
47 jours restants
Mai 14, 2026
Détails du contrat
Catégorie
Construction
Référence
306891
Valeur
€15,000,000
Lieu
Estonia, Estonie
Publié
Mars 27, 2026
Code CPV
Critères d'évaluation
Cost100%
Calendrier du projet

Publication de l'appel d'offres

Mars 27, 2026

Date limite pour les questions

Mai 07, 2026

Date limite de soumission

Mai 14, 2026

Ouverture de l'appel d'offres

Mai 14, 2026

Date de début du contrat

Juin 04, 2026

Probabilité de gainPRO
🔒
Passer au Professionnel
Consultez votre probabilité de gain estimée basée sur les données historiques.
Passer au Professionnel →
Intelligence acheteurPRO
🔒
Débloquer l'intelligence acheteur
Consultez les modèles de dépenses, les procédures préférées et plus encore.
Passer au Professionnel →
Aperçu du secteurPRO
🔒
Débloquer les aperçus du secteur
Consultez les prix gagnants moyens, les niveaux de concurrence et les tendances du marché.
Passer au Professionnel →
Budget
€15,000,000
Durée
36 mois
Lieu
Estonia
Type
Construction
75
Score de qualité/100
Bon
Référentiel de marché
Prix moyen gagnant
€524,963
Offres moyennes
4.7
Concurrence
Moyenne
PME gagnantes
94%
5,932 appels d'offres analysés

Description originale de l'appel d'offres

L'objet du présent accord-cadre est la reconstruction de canalisations d'égout (y compris la conception si nécessaire) par la méthode sans tranchée (CIPP).
Achats écologiquesSoumission électronique

Analyse des risques

Veuillez vous connecter pour utiliser l'analyse des risques.

Se connecter

Stratégie gagnante

Connectez-vous pour accéder aux recommandations de stratégie gagnante.

Se connecter

Concurrents

Passez à un plan supérieur pour voir quelles entreprises sont susceptibles de soumissionner pour cet appel d'offres, basé sur les données historiques.

Se connecter

Exigences et qualifications

14 exigences dans 5 catégories

Soumission (7)
Obligatoire (1)
Conformité (3)
Technique (2)
Financier (1)
SUBMISSION REQUIREMENTS7
--Bids will be evaluated solely on cost.
--The tender is for a framework agreement with subsequent mini-competitions.
--References to standards or other bases in the public procurement documents are to be read as supplemented by "or equivalent".
MANDATORY EXCLUSION GROUNDS1
--Bidders must not have criminal convictions related to money laundering, terrorist financing, or human trafficking.
ELIGIBILITY REQUIREMENTS3
--Bidders must be legally registered entities.
--If relying on third-party resources, the third party's place of residence or establishment must be in Estonia, another EU member state, an EEA contracting state, or a WTO GPA member state.
--For joint bids, a power of attorney is required to authorize one party to represent all participants.
TECHNICAL CAPABILITY REQUIREMENTS2
--Bidders must demonstrate the ability to reconstruct pipelines using the CIPP method.
--Bidders must provide detailed costs for works and materials for CIPP Sector 41.
FINANCIAL REQUIREMENTS1
--Not explicitly detailed, but implied by the need to provide cost breakdowns.

Aperçu des exigences

Inscrivez-vous pour consulter les exigences et l'analyse complètes

Documents

7 documents disponibles avec des résumés IA

Alltöövõtjate kontrollimise tingimused lepingu täitmise etapisPDF
306891_alltoovotjate_kontrollimise_tingimused... -- 20.7 KB

The contracting authority will verify subcontractors' backgrounds regarding criminal convictions for money laundering, terrorism financing, and human trafficking, requiring relevant explanations and evidence.

VastavustingimusedPDF
306891_vastavustingimused.pdf -- 9.8 KB

This compliance conditions document clarifies rules for submitting joint bids, requirements for presenting bid costs, and restrictions on marking trade secrets.

Pakkumuse maksumusXLS
Lisa 3 Pakkumuse maksumuse vorm CIPP Sektor 4... -- 38.7 KB

The contracting authority AS Tallinna Vesi is seeking bids for the reconstruction of sewage pipelines using the CIPP method, requiring detailed cost breakdowns for labor and materials.

Hindamiskriteeriumid ja hinnatavad näitajadPDF
306891_hindamiskriteeriumid.pdf -- 2.8 KB

The contracting authority AKTSIASELTS TALLINNA VESI evaluates bids for the reconstruction of sewage pipelines using the CIPP method, where the sole evaluation criterion is the bid price.

Hankepass täiendatavate selgitustegaPDF
306891_hankepass_taiendavate_selgitustega.pdf -- 41.0 KB

The tender pass is an initial self-declaration by the contractor, containing the contracting authority's conditions and expected response formats, but is not intended for completion.

Teise ettevõtja nõusolek tema vahenditele tuginemiseksDOC
Teise ettevõtja nõusolek tema vahenditele tug... -- 54.1 KB

This document is a consent for utilizing another company's resources in the tender, confirming their economic, financial, and technical competence and willingness to participate in contract execution.

Ühispakkuja volikiriDOC
Ühispakkujate volikiri.docx -- 64.1 KB

This power of attorney is required from joint bidders to authorize one party to represent all in the tender process and contract signing.

Aperçu des documents

Inscrivez-vous pour consulter les résumés et l'analyse des documents

75
Bon

Score de qualité de l'appel d'offres

This tender for sewage pipeline reconstruction using the CIPP method is generally well-structured, with clear technical requirements and a straightforward evaluation criterion (price). However, it lacks explicit detail on financial requirements and innovation, and the reliance on subsequent mini-competitions might impact long-term planning for bidders.

Répartition du score

Conformité légale75/100

The tender appears to comply with general procurement regulations, including the use of CPV codes and a clear procedure. Deadlines are specified and seem reasonable. The mention of 'or equivalent' for standards is a positive aspect for legal compliance. No explicit disputes or suspensions are noted.

Clarté80/100

The description of the service (CIPP method reconstruction) is clear. Requirements for technical capability and submission are documented. The evaluation criterion (price) is explicitly stated. The conditions for joint bids and third-party reliance are also clear.

Exhaustivité70/100

Most basic information is present, including estimated value, duration, and contract start date. However, financial requirements are not explicitly detailed beyond the need for cost breakdowns, and the financing condition refers to external documents. The framework agreement structure with mini-competitions is explained, but this could be more detailed.

Financial requirements not explicitly detailed beyond cost breakdowns.
Équité85/100

The tender is fair in its approach, with full document access implied and the value disclosed. The evaluation criterion being solely price is objective. The use of e-submission and e-procurement enhances fairness. There are no apparent requirements tailored to specific companies.

Aspect pratique65/100

E-submission and e-procurement are specified, which is practical. The contract start date is provided. However, the financing condition is vague, referring to external documents. The framework agreement with mini-competitions, while common, can add complexity to practical execution for bidders.

Financing condition refers to external documents, lacking direct detail.
Cohérence des données90/100

Key fields such as title, reference, organization, estimated value, and deadlines are populated. Dates are logical and consistent. There are no reported suspensions or disputes, contributing to data consistency.

Durabilité50/100

The tender mentions 'Green Procurement' and 'Social Criteria' as characteristics, which is positive. However, there is no specific detail on how these will be implemented or evaluated, and it is not indicated as EU funded, limiting the score in this category.

Lack of specific details on how green and social criteria will be applied or evaluated.

Points forts

Clear technical requirements and evaluation criterion (price).
Use of e-submission and e-procurement.
Explicit mention of 'or equivalent' for standards.
Framework agreement structure with subsequent mini-competitions is explained.

Préoccupations

Financial requirements are not explicitly detailed.
Lack of specific details on sustainability criteria implementation.
Framework agreement structure might add complexity for bidders.

Recommandations

1. Provide more explicit details on financial requirements and expected cost breakdowns.
2. Elaborate on the specific implementation and evaluation of green and social criteria.
3. Consider providing a more detailed overview of the mini-competition process within the tender documents.

Aperçu de la notation IA

Inscrivez-vous pour consulter les exigences et l'analyse complètes

Analyse complète du score de qualité
Répartition détaillée des sous-scores
Aperçu des forces et des préoccupations
Recommandations stratégiques

Aucune carte de crédit requise • Configuration en 2 minutes

Nouveau service

Vous voulez qu'on s'occupe de cet appel d'offres ?

Nos experts en marchés publics préparent tout. Solution éprouvée — vous relisez, validez et soumettez.

~1hVotre temps uniquement
80%+80%+
$0D'avance
Voir la comparaison complète
Sans TaaSAvec TaaS
40–80 heures
Temps de préparation
~1 heure
Votre temps uniquement
15–25%
Taux de réussite moyen
80%+
Taux de réussite
Risque d'erreurs
Vérification manuelle
QA expert
Contrôle de conformité
Vous faites tout
Gérez tout vous-même
Nous faisons tout
Service clé en main
Gagnons cet appel d'offres !
Payez uniquement en cas de victoire — frais de succès uniquement · Utilisé par plus de 400 entreprises
Ou faites-le vous-même

Ajouter au Pipeline