Travaux de conception et de construction d'atelier

This tender for design and construction works is generally well-structured with clear requirements and a reasonable timeline. However, it lacks explicit sustainability considerations and could benefit from more detailed technical specifications.

The tender appears to comply with general procurement regulations, including a proper CPV code and a reasonable submission deadline. No disputes are noted. The procedure type (MS) suggests a negotiated procedure, which is permissible. The deadlines are clearly stated and appear reasonable for the scope.

The description of the works is clear, and the AI-extracted requirements outline the necessary qualifications and technical capabilities. The evaluation criteria are mentioned as 'relative_weighting' and primarily cost-based, which is understandable, though more detail on the weighting would enhance clarity.

Most basic information is present, including title, reference, organization, estimated value, and duration. However, the 'Pakkumustabel' (Offer Table) format is not supported for AI analysis, which might indicate a missing or inaccessible crucial document for bidders. The technical specifications (Lähteülesanne) are marked as 'Required: No', which is a significant omission for a design-build tender.

The tender is conducted via e-procurement, and the value is disclosed. The criteria are objective (turnover, experience, key personnel qualifications). The requirement for an average net turnover of EUR 500,000 is specific but not tailored to a single company, appearing as a standard financial threshold. The evaluation being primarily cost-based is common.

The tender specifies electronic submission and e-procurement. The contract duration is clearly stated. However, the contract start date is not explicitly mentioned, and financing information is absent. The reliance on specific document formats for analysis could pose a practical challenge.

Key fields such as title, reference, organization, value, and deadlines are populated. There are no reported suspensions or disputes. The dates provided (Reveal Date, Submission Deadline, Opening Date) are logically sequenced.

The tender does not explicitly mention any green procurement, social aspects, or innovation focus. It is not indicated as EU-funded. This area is underdeveloped.