Reconstruction du poste de distribution n° 850, rue Gildi 11, ville de Tallinn, comté de Harju (IK1211)

This tender for substation reconstruction in Tallinn is generally well-structured with clear financial and timeline information. However, it lacks explicit detail on technical capabilities and sustainability aspects, and relies heavily on external documents for crucial requirements.

The tender adheres to basic legal requirements with proper CPV codes, a clear procedure, and specified deadlines. The value is disclosed and within limits. The financing conditions are detailed. No disputes are noted. The regulatory compliance appears to be met at a general level, but detailed review of attached documents is necessary for full assurance.

The core objective and location are clearly described. Key personnel and financial requirements are outlined. However, the reliance on multiple external PDF and Excel documents for detailed requirements (exclusion grounds, eligibility, technical capabilities, financial tables) slightly reduces overall clarity. The 'Muu' type documents being in unsupported formats also hinders clarity.

Most basic information is present, including title, reference, organization, estimated value, and deadlines. The contract duration is implied by the 'Tender Valid' period and completion date. However, several crucial requirement documents are in unsupported formats or not fully summarized, which impacts the completeness of the accessible information for analysis.

The tender allows for general access to documents and discloses the estimated value. The evaluation criterion is 'relative_weighting' with the lowest price being best, which is objective. E-procurement and electronic submission are standard. Deadlines seem reasonable. No requirements appear tailored to specific companies.

E-submission and e-procurement are indicated. A contract start date is provided. Financing conditions are detailed, including payment terms and factoring options. However, the reliance on numerous external documents, some in unsupported formats, impacts the ease of submission and overall practicality. The lack of direct URLs for all referenced documents is a minor drawback.

Key fields such as title, reference, organization, value, and dates are populated. The tender status is '11' (likely active). The contract start date logically follows the submission deadline. No suspensions or disputes are noted. The duration type and validity period are specified.

The tender is marked as 'EU Funded'. However, there are no explicit mentions or requirements related to green procurement, social aspects, or innovation within the provided text. This is a missed opportunity to integrate sustainability goals into the procurement process.