Retour aux appels d'offres

Construction d'un puits d'ascenseur et d'un ascenseur dans le bâtiment du Lycée des Langues de Narva pour l'intégration des élèves ayant des besoins éducatifs spéciaux dans le processus d'apprentissage

Ouvert
Date limite
13 jours restants
Mars 16, 2026
Détails du contrat
Catégorie
Construction
Référence
306181
Valeur
€74,096
Lieu
Estonia, Estonie
Publié
Février 17, 2026
Code CPV
Critères d'évaluation
Total bid cost100%
Calendrier du projet

Publication de l'appel d'offres

Février 17, 2026

Date limite pour les questions

Mars 09, 2026

Date limite de soumission

Mars 16, 2026

Ouverture de l'appel d'offres

Mars 16, 2026

Probabilité de gainPRO
🔒
Passer au Professionnel
Consultez votre probabilité de gain estimée basée sur les données historiques.
Passer au Professionnel →
Intelligence acheteurPRO
🔒
Débloquer l'intelligence acheteur
Consultez les modèles de dépenses, les procédures préférées et plus encore.
Passer au Professionnel →
Aperçu du secteurPRO
🔒
Débloquer les aperçus du secteur
Consultez les prix gagnants moyens, les niveaux de concurrence et les tendances du marché.
Passer au Professionnel →
Budget
€74,096
Durée
5 mois
Lieu
Estonia
Type
Construction
82
Score de qualité/100
Excellent
Référentiel de marché
Prix moyen gagnant
€524,963
Offres moyennes
4.7
Concurrence
Moyenne
PME gagnantes
94%
5,932 appels d'offres analysés

Description originale de l'appel d'offres

L'objectif principal de l'appel d'offres est de réaliser tous les travaux de construction spécifiés dans la documentation du projet et les documents d'appel d'offres publics dans les délais et aux coûts optimaux. Le bâtiment doit être conforme à toutes les exigences légales et normatives, être aussi durable et durable que possible en termes d'entretien, et avoir des coûts d'entretien les plus bas possible.
Financement UESoumission électronique

Analyse des risques

Veuillez vous connecter pour utiliser l'analyse des risques.

Se connecter

Stratégie gagnante

Connectez-vous pour accéder aux recommandations de stratégie gagnante.

Se connecter

Concurrents

Passez à un plan supérieur pour voir quelles entreprises sont susceptibles de soumissionner pour cet appel d'offres, basé sur les données historiques.

Se connecter

Exigences et qualifications

18 exigences dans 5 catégories

Soumission (7)
Obligatoire (2)
Conformité (5)
Technique (2)
Financier (2)
SUBMISSION REQUIREMENTS7
--The bidder must submit the bid price using the "Lisa 2 Pakkumuse maksumustabel (LIFT).xlsx" document.
--The bidder must submit the European Single Procurement Document (ESPD) electronically.
--The bidder must confirm the submission of costs.
MANDATORY EXCLUSION GROUNDS2
--The bidder (and its subcontractors) must not have committed criminal offenses such as fraud or money laundering.
--The bidder must meet the exclusion conditions described in the ESPD guide.
ELIGIBILITY REQUIREMENTS5
--The bidder must confirm compliance with all tender conditions.
--The bidder must meet the qualification conditions described in the ESPD guide.
--In case of a joint bid, a power of attorney must be confirmed/provided.
TECHNICAL CAPABILITY REQUIREMENTS2
--The bidder must be capable of building and installing a lift shaft and lift according to the technical requirements specified in "Lisa 1 Tehniline kirjeldus (LIFT)_1702.doc".
--The lift and shaft must integrate SEN students into the learning process.
FINANCIAL REQUIREMENTS2
--The bidder must submit a detailed breakdown of the bid price.
--The bid price is the sole evaluation criterion, with the lowest price receiving maximum points.

Aperçu des exigences

Inscrivez-vous pour consulter les exigences et l'analyse complètes

Documents

7 documents disponibles avec des résumés IA

Alltöövõtjate kontrollimise tingimused lepingu täitmise etapisPDF
306181_alltoovotjate_kontrollimise_tingimused... -- 20.8 KB

This document outlines the conditions for checking subcontractors and the grounds for their exclusion during the contract execution phase, focusing on criminal offenses such as fraud and money laundering.

VastavustingimusedPDF
306181_vastavustingimused.pdf -- 6.8 KB

This document specifies compliance conditions, requiring bidders to confirm joint bid authorization, declare business secrets, ensure subcontractor eligibility, and affirm adherence to all tender terms and cost submission.

Lisa 2. Pakkumuse maksumustabelXLS
Lisa 2 Pakkumuse maksumustabel (LIFT).xlsx -- 51.0 KB

This tender cost table is required for detailed submission of the bid price, including a breakdown of costs and unit prices for various cost groups and works.

Hindamiskriteeriumid ja hinnatavad näitajadPDF
306181_hindamiskriteeriumid.pdf -- 2.8 KB

This document describes the tender evaluation criteria, where the sole criterion is the total bid cost (100% weight), with the lowest price receiving the maximum points.

Hankepass täiendatavate selgitustegaPDF
306181_hankepass_taiendavate_selgitustega.pdf -- 70.3 KB

This document is an explanatory guide for completing the European Single Procurement Document (ESPD), outlining the contracting authority's qualification and exclusion criteria that bidders must submit electronically.

Lisa 1. Tehniline kirjeldusDOC
Lisa 1 Tehniline kirjeldus (LIFT)_1702.doc -- 85.0 KB

This document outlines the technical specifications for the construction of an elevator shaft and the installation of an elevator in the Narva Language Lyceum, aimed at integrating students with special educational needs into the learning process.

Lisa 3. Hankelepingu projektDOC
Lisa 3 Hankelepingu projekt (LIFT)_1702.docx -- 49.6 KB

This document is the draft works contract for the construction of a lift shaft and lift in the Narva Language Lyceum, outlining the contract terms and parties.

Aperçu des documents

Inscrivez-vous pour consulter les résumés et l'analyse des documents

82
Excellent

Score de qualité de l'appel d'offres

This tender is generally well-structured and comprehensive, demonstrating good legal compliance and fairness. However, a notable inconsistency regarding the evaluation criteria and the lack of explicit green or innovation aspects slightly detract from its overall quality.

Répartition du score

Conformité légale85/100

The tender appears to comply with EU/national procurement regulations, utilizing ESPD and electronic submission for an EU-funded project. Deadlines are reasonable, and CPV codes are appropriately assigned. The procedure type is indicated by a code, which is common but could be more explicitly described for universal clarity.

Clarté75/100

The description and AI-extracted requirements are generally clear and well-documented, referring to specific annexes for technical specifications and submission forms. However, there is a direct contradiction between the 'Evaluation Criteria: relative_weighting' characteristic and the explicit statement in Document 2 and AI-extracted financial requirements that the 'sole criterion is the total bid cost (100% weight)'. This inconsistency significantly reduces clarity.

Contradiction in evaluation criteria description (relative weighting vs. lowest price only).
Exhaustivité90/100

The tender is highly complete, providing all basic information, financial details, timelines, and location. All essential documents, including technical specifications, draft contract, and submission forms, are listed and appear to be available, ensuring bidders have comprehensive information.

Équité95/100

Fairness is excellent, with full document access, disclosed value, and reasonable preparation time. The evaluation criterion (lowest price) is objective and transparent, and e-procurement ensures equal access. There is no indication that requirements are tailored to a specific company.

Aspect pratique80/100

The tender supports electronic submission and e-procurement, which enhances practicality. The contract duration and financing information are clearly specified. While a specific contract start date is not provided, this is typical for the tender stage.

Cohérence des données70/100

Most key fields are populated, and dates are logical. However, the significant inconsistency regarding the evaluation criteria (relative weighting vs. 100% lowest price) is a notable flaw in data consistency.

Inconsistent description of evaluation criteria.
Durabilité60/100

The tender explicitly addresses a strong social aspect by aiming to integrate SEN students into the learning process, which is commendable. It is also EU-funded, implying adherence to higher standards. However, there are no explicit green procurement or innovation-focused criteria mentioned.

Lack of explicit green procurement criteria.
No explicit innovation focus.

Points forts

Clear social objective (integrating SEN students).
Comprehensive documentation provided.
High transparency and fairness in process.
Electronic submission and e-procurement enabled.
EU-funded project, implying robust standards.

Préoccupations

Contradiction in evaluation criteria description.
Lack of explicit green procurement criteria.
No explicit innovation focus.

Recommandations

1. Clarify and harmonize the description of evaluation criteria to avoid ambiguity.
2. Consider incorporating explicit green procurement criteria where applicable.
3. Explore opportunities to include innovation-focused aspects in future tenders.

Aperçu de la notation IA

Inscrivez-vous pour consulter les exigences et l'analyse complètes

Analyse complète du score de qualité
Répartition détaillée des sous-scores
Aperçu des forces et des préoccupations
Recommandations stratégiques

Aucune carte de crédit requise • Configuration en 2 minutes

Ajouter au Pipeline