T26-045CAP Re-surfaçage de cimetière 2026

This tender for cemetery re-surfacing is generally well-structured with clear basic information and a defined scope. However, it lacks detailed technical and financial requirements, and the availability of tender documents is limited.

The tender appears to comply with basic legal requirements, including a clear CPV code and no reported disputes. The procedure is identified as 'Below threshold - open competition'. The submission deadline is provided, but its reasonableness is flagged as a potential issue due to the short timeframe relative to the contract start date. The absence of a reveal date is a minor procedural oversight.

The description of the works is clear, outlining the scope of scarifying, new surfacing, ironwork replacement, and roadmarkings. The submission method is explicitly stated. However, the lack of specified evaluation criteria and detailed technical/financial requirements reduces overall clarity for potential bidders.

Most basic information is present, including title, reference, organization, estimated value, and duration. The contract start date is provided. However, the critical issue is the lack of accessible content for the tender documents, which severely impacts completeness.

The tender is an open competition, which promotes fairness. The estimated value is disclosed, and the e-procurement platform (EtendersNI) is specified. The criteria for evaluation are not detailed, which could be a concern. There are no apparent requirements tailored to specific companies.

The requirement to submit via EtendersNI is clear, but the tender documents themselves are not readily accessible with content, hindering practical preparation. The contract start date is provided, and financing information is implied by the estimated value. The duration is specified.

Key fields such as title, reference, organization, value, and deadlines are populated. There are no reported disputes or suspensions. The dates provided (submission deadline, contract start) are logically ordered.

The tender does not explicitly mention any green procurement, social aspects, or innovation focus. It is not indicated as EU funded. This suggests a lack of emphasis on sustainability criteria.