Skip to main content
Retour aux appels d'offres

Reconstruction de la façade du bâtiment du centre communautaire de Vastseliina

Ouvert
Date limite
3 jours restants
Mars 30, 2026
Détails du contrat
Catégorie
Construction
Référence
306080
Valeur
€60,000
Lieu
Estonia, Estonie
Publié
Mars 05, 2026
Organisation
Code CPV
Critères d'évaluation
Total reconstruction cost100%
Calendrier du projet

Publication de l'appel d'offres

Mars 05, 2026

Date limite pour les questions

Mars 23, 2026

Date limite de soumission

Mars 30, 2026

Ouverture de l'appel d'offres

Mars 30, 2026

Probabilité de gainPRO
🔒
Passer au Professionnel
Consultez votre probabilité de gain estimée basée sur les données historiques.
Passer au Professionnel →
Intelligence acheteurPRO
🔒
Débloquer l'intelligence acheteur
Consultez les modèles de dépenses, les procédures préférées et plus encore.
Passer au Professionnel →
Aperçu du secteurPRO
🔒
Débloquer les aperçus du secteur
Consultez les prix gagnants moyens, les niveaux de concurrence et les tendances du marché.
Passer au Professionnel →
Budget
€60,000
Durée
4 mois
Lieu
Estonia
Type
Construction
75
Score de qualité/100
Bon
Référentiel de marché
Prix moyen gagnant
€524,963
Offres moyennes
4.7
Concurrence
Moyenne
PME gagnantes
94%
5,932 appels d'offres analysés

Description originale de l'appel d'offres

L'objet du marché public est la construction liée à la reconstruction de la façade du bâtiment du centre communautaire situé à Võidu tn 38, Vastseliina alevik, Võru vald, Võrumaa, en tant qu'entreprise générale, conformément à la description technique et aux conditions de l'autorité contractante.
Soumission électronique

Analyse des risques

Veuillez vous connecter pour utiliser l'analyse des risques.

Se connecter

Stratégie gagnante

Connectez-vous pour accéder aux recommandations de stratégie gagnante.

Se connecter

Concurrents

Passez à un plan supérieur pour voir quelles entreprises sont susceptibles de soumissionner pour cet appel d'offres, basé sur les données historiques.

Se connecter

Exigences et qualifications

14 exigences dans 5 catégories

Soumission (6)
Obligatoire (1)
Conformité (2)
Technique (2)
Financier (3)
SUBMISSION REQUIREMENTS6
--The bidder must submit the Hankepass, which is an initial proof of qualification and compliance, filled out electronically.
--The bidder must submit the completed work schedule in the provided Excel format.
--The bidder must submit the detailed cost breakdown in the provided Excel format.
MANDATORY EXCLUSION GROUNDS1
--No specific mandatory exclusion grounds mentioned in the provided documents.
ELIGIBILITY REQUIREMENTS2
--The bidder must confirm their qualification and compliance using the Hankepass (initial proof of qualification and compliance).
--The bidder must electronically fill out the document intended for completion.
TECHNICAL CAPABILITY REQUIREMENTS2
--The bidder must submit a work schedule detailing the breakdown of works by parts and months, including instructions for its completion.
--The technical description specifies cornice repair works, rainwater system reconstruction, and facade finishing works using specific lime plaster products.
FINANCIAL REQUIREMENTS3
--Bids will be evaluated primarily based on the total reconstruction cost, with the lowest price receiving the maximum score.
--The bidder must submit a detailed cost breakdown for the facade reconstruction works using the provided cost form.
--The total value of the tender is 60,000.0 EUR.

Aperçu des exigences

Inscrivez-vous pour consulter les exigences et l'analyse complètes

Documents

8 documents disponibles avec des résumés IA

VastavustingimusedPDF
306080_vastavustingimused.pdf -- 5.7 KB

Compliance conditions specify how to submit the bid price, declare trade secrets, restrict subcontractor involvement, and accept general tender terms.

Lisa 1: Maksumuse vormXLS
Lisa 1 Maksumuse vorm.xlsx -- 11.2 KB

This document is a cost form where detailed tender costs for facade reconstruction works must be submitted.

Hindamiskriteeriumid ja hinnatavad näitajadPDF
306080_hindamiskriteeriumid.pdf -- 3.1 KB

The contracting authority evaluates bids primarily based on the total reconstruction cost, where the lowest price receives the maximum score.

Hankepass täiendatavate selgitustegaPDF
306080_hankepass_taiendavate_selgitustega.pdf -- 33.6 KB

The procurement pass is the bidder's self-declaration, serving as preliminary proof of qualification and compliance, but the document intended for completion must be filled out electronically.

Lisa 3 – Hankelepingu projektDOC
Hankelepingu projekt_Vastseliina rahvamaja fa... -- 41.0 KB

This document is a draft main contractor agreement outlining the terms and objectives for the facade reconstruction works of the Vastseliina community center.

Hankedokument (HD)DOC
HD Pakkumuse kutse.docx -- 38.5 KB

The tender document (HD) provides instructions for preparing and submitting a bid for the reconstruction of the Vastseliina community center facade under a simplified procurement procedure.

Lepingu lisa 2 - Tööde Ajakava vormXLS
Lepingu lisa 2 - Tööde Ajakava vorm.xlsx -- 11.5 KB

The tender requires the submission of a work schedule form detailing the breakdown of work by phases and months, including instructions for its completion.

Lisa 2- Tehniline kirjeldusDOC
Lisa 2 Vastseliina Rahvamaja fassaditööde teh... -- 13.6 MB

The technical specification for the reconstruction of the Vastseliina community center facade details cornice repair work, rainwater system reconstruction, and facade finishing using specific lime plaster products.

Aperçu des documents

Inscrivez-vous pour consulter les résumés et l'analyse des documents

75
Bon

Score de qualité de l'appel d'offres

This tender for facade reconstruction of Vastseliina community center is generally well-structured, with clear technical specifications and submission requirements. However, it lacks explicit sustainability considerations and relies heavily on draft contract documents for key details.

Répartition du score

Conformité légale75/100

The tender appears to comply with general procurement regulations, including the use of a proper CPV code and a reasonable submission deadline. The procedure is identified as 'LM' (likely a simplified procedure), and the status '11' suggests it is active. No disputes are reported. The financing condition refers to the draft contract, which is acceptable but could be more explicit.

Clarté80/100

The description of the works is clear, detailing specific reconstruction tasks. Requirements are documented through various attached files, and the evaluation criteria (relative weighting based on price) are specified. Conditions for submission are also outlined.

Exhaustivité70/100

Most basic information is present, including deadlines, estimated value, and contract duration. However, the financing condition and the exact end date for works are deferred to the draft contract project, which slightly reduces completeness. All required submission forms are listed.

Équité85/100

The tender utilizes e-procurement and electronic submission, promoting accessibility. Objective criteria for evaluation (lowest price) are stated. Full document access is implied through the listed tender documents. There are no apparent requirements tailored to specific companies.

Aspect pratique65/100

E-submission is mandated. While document URLs are not explicitly provided in this snippet, the presence of numerous attached documents suggests they are accessible through the e-procurement platform. The contract start date is not explicitly stated but can be inferred from the submission and opening dates. Financing information is linked to the draft contract.

Contract start date not explicitly stated.
Cohérence des données90/100

Key fields such as title, reference, organization, value, and deadlines are populated. There are no reported suspensions or disputes. The dates provided (reveal, submission, opening) are logically sequenced.

Durabilité50/100

The tender does not explicitly mention green procurement, social aspects, or innovation. It is not indicated as EU-funded. This area is underdeveloped.

Lack of green procurement criteria.
Absence of social responsibility considerations.

Points forts

Clear technical specifications.
Mandatory e-submission and e-procurement.
Objective evaluation criteria (lowest price).
Well-defined submission requirements and forms.

Préoccupations

Key contract details (financing, end date) deferred to draft contract.
Lack of explicit sustainability considerations.
Contract start date not explicitly stated.

Recommandations

1. Consider incorporating specific sustainability criteria (e.g., eco-friendly materials, waste management).
2. Explicitly state the contract start date or a clear mechanism for its determination.

Aperçu de la notation IA

Inscrivez-vous pour consulter les exigences et l'analyse complètes

Analyse complète du score de qualité
Répartition détaillée des sous-scores
Aperçu des forces et des préoccupations
Recommandations stratégiques

Aucune carte de crédit requise • Configuration en 2 minutes

Nouveau service

Vous voulez qu'on s'occupe de cet appel d'offres ?

Nos experts en marchés publics préparent tout. Solution éprouvée — vous relisez, validez et soumettez.

~1hVotre temps uniquement
80%+80%+
$0D'avance
Voir la comparaison complète
Sans TaaSAvec TaaS
40–80 heures
Temps de préparation
~1 heure
Votre temps uniquement
15–25%
Taux de réussite moyen
80%+
Taux de réussite
Risque d'erreurs
Vérification manuelle
QA expert
Contrôle de conformité
Vous faites tout
Gérez tout vous-même
Nous faisons tout
Service clé en main
Gagnons cet appel d'offres !
Payez uniquement en cas de victoire — frais de succès uniquement · Utilisé par plus de 400 entreprises
Ou faites-le vous-même

Ajouter au Pipeline