FW - Vie Autonome 2026 - Avis d'attribution de marché

This is an open procedure tender for a framework agreement with a significant estimated value, featuring clear lots and duration. However, it lacks detailed evaluation criteria and mandatory exclusion grounds, and offers limited information on sustainability.

The tender follows an open procedure, which is legally compliant. The CPV code is provided, and the status is active with no reported disputes. However, the absence of specified evaluation criteria and detailed mandatory exclusion grounds introduces some ambiguity regarding full regulatory compliance.

The description of the framework and its lots is clear, and the core requirements for bidders are outlined. The duration and estimated value are specified. However, the lack of detailed technical, financial, and specific eligibility requirements beyond broad statements reduces overall clarity for bidders.

Basic information such as title, reference, organization, estimated value, duration, and deadlines are present. The structure of the framework and its lots is outlined. However, the critical omission of detailed evaluation criteria, mandatory exclusion grounds, and the availability of only 4 tender documents with no content significantly impacts completeness.

The tender is an open procedure, allowing broad access. The estimated value is disclosed, and the framework is divided into multiple lots, offering opportunities for various suppliers. The use of a multi-source framework with multi-tiered pricing can promote competition. The primary concern is the lack of detailed, objective evaluation criteria, which could lead to perceived bias.

The tender specifies a contract start date and duration. However, the AI-extracted requirements mention submission in multiple languages (English, Estonian, Latvian, Polish, and Lithuanian) which is unusual and likely an extraction error, as tenders are typically submitted in the language of the procuring authority (English for the UK-based organization). The lack of information on e-submission, financing, and the URL for documents hinders practical application.

Key fields like title, reference, organization, estimated value, and deadlines are populated consistently. The contract duration and start dates are logically aligned. There are no indications of suspension or disputes.

There is no mention of green procurement, social aspects, or innovation within the tender details. This indicates a complete absence of sustainability considerations.