Retour aux appels d'offres

Conception de l'école et du gymnase Veeriku de Tartu

Ouvert
Date limite
14 jours restants
Mars 16, 2026
Détails du contrat
Catégorie
Services
Référence
304469
Valeur
€420,000
Lieu
Estonia, Estonie
Publié
Février 13, 2026
Organisation
Code CPV
Critères d'évaluation
Cost60%
Portfolio quality30%
Designer's experience in school building projects10%
Calendrier du projet

Publication de l'appel d'offres

Février 13, 2026

Date limite pour les questions

Mars 09, 2026

Date limite de soumission

Mars 16, 2026

Ouverture de l'appel d'offres

Mars 16, 2026

Probabilité de gainPRO
🔒
Passer au Professionnel
Consultez votre probabilité de gain estimée basée sur les données historiques.
Passer au Professionnel →
Intelligence acheteurPRO
🔒
Débloquer l'intelligence acheteur
Consultez les modèles de dépenses, les procédures préférées et plus encore.
Passer au Professionnel →
Aperçu du secteurPRO
🔒
Débloquer les aperçus du secteur
Consultez les prix gagnants moyens, les niveaux de concurrence et les tendances du marché.
Passer au Professionnel →
Budget
€420,000
Durée
17 mois
Lieu
Estonia
Type
Services
82
Score de qualité/100
Excellent
Référentiel de marché
Prix moyen gagnant
€71,415
Offres moyennes
4.8
Concurrence
Moyenne
PME gagnantes
99%
2,006 appels d'offres analysés

Description originale de l'appel d'offres

L'objet du contrat de marché est la conception de la reconstruction du bâtiment scolaire situé au Veeriku tn 41 à Tartu et d'un nouveau gymnase à côté (Veeriku tn 43) en tant qu'entrepreneur principal.
Soumission électronique

Analyse des risques

Veuillez vous connecter pour utiliser l'analyse des risques.

Se connecter

Stratégie gagnante

Connectez-vous pour accéder aux recommandations de stratégie gagnante.

Se connecter

Concurrents

Passez à un plan supérieur pour voir quelles entreprises sont susceptibles de soumissionner pour cet appel d'offres, basé sur les données historiques.

Se connecter

Exigences et qualifications

16 exigences dans 5 catégories

Soumission (4)
Obligatoire (2)
Conformité (5)
Technique (4)
Financier (1)
SUBMISSION REQUIREMENTS4
--Bidders must submit confirmations and explanations regarding Russia sanctions.
--Bidders must declare business secrets.
--Bidders must complete the European Single Procurement Document (ESPD) electronically.
MANDATORY EXCLUSION GROUNDS2
--Bidders must not be subject to Russia sanctions.
--Bidders must meet the exclusion grounds specified in the European Single Procurement Document (ESPD).
ELIGIBILITY REQUIREMENTS5
--Bidders must submit a power of attorney for joint bids.
--Bidders must meet the qualification conditions specified in the European Single Procurement Document (ESPD).
--Bidders must be capable of taking responsibility for obtaining necessary permits as per the contract.
TECHNICAL CAPABILITY REQUIREMENTS4
--Bidders must submit a high-quality portfolio.
--Bidders must have experience in designing school buildings.
--Bidders must be capable of fulfilling the scope of work for the design of Tartu Veeriku school and sports hall.
FINANCIAL REQUIREMENTS1
--Bidders must be capable of meeting the financial terms of the procurement contract.

Aperçu des exigences

Inscrivez-vous pour consulter les exigences et l'analyse complètes

Documents

6 documents disponibles avec des résumés IA

VastavustingimusedPDF
304469_vastavustingimused.pdf -- 9.4 KB

This document outlines tenderer requirements concerning Russian sanctions, power of attorney for joint tenders, and the declaration of business secrets, requiring tenderers to provide corresponding confirmations and explanations.

Hindamiskriteeriumid ja hinnatavad näitajadPDF
304469_hindamiskriteeriumid.pdf -- 4.8 KB

This document outlines the evaluation criteria for the Tartu Veeriku school and sports hall design tender, covering cost (60%), portfolio quality (30%), and the designer's experience in school building projects (10%).

Hankepass täiendatavate selgitustegaPDF
304469_hankepass_taiendavate_selgitustega.pdf -- 69.0 KB

This document is an explanatory guide to the European Single Procurement Document (ESPD), detailing the exclusion grounds and qualification conditions for the Tartu Veeriku school and sports hall design tender, which bidders must complete electronically.

AllutamislepingDOC
Allutamisleping.docx -- 32.7 KB

This document is a subordination agreement regulating the cooperation and relationships between the designer and the builder of Tartu Veeriku School with the client during the preparation of the work project, to ensure a high-quality final outcome.

HankelepingDOC
Hankeleping.docx -- 86.5 KB

This document is a draft procurement contract for the design services of the Tartu Veeriku school and sports hall, detailing special conditions, scope of work, permit responsibilities, timelines, and financial terms.

LisateaveDOC
Lisateave.doc -- 43.0 KB

This document provides additional information regarding the tender for the design of Tartu Veeriku school and sports hall, offering further clarifications and context to bidders.

Aperçu des documents

Inscrivez-vous pour consulter les résumés et l'analyse des documents

82
Excellent

Score de qualité de l'appel d'offres

This is a well-structured and transparent tender for design services, demonstrating strong legal compliance and fairness. While comprehensive in its requirements and evaluation, it lacks explicit sustainability or social considerations.

Répartition du score

Conformité légale90/100

The tender demonstrates strong legal compliance, with a clearly defined procedure, appropriate CPV codes, and explicit checks for Russia sanctions and ESPD exclusion grounds. The submission deadline of 32 days is reasonable, and no disputes or suspensions are noted.

Clarté85/100

The tender description is clear and unambiguous, and the AI-extracted requirements are well-categorized and understandable. Evaluation criteria are clearly specified with relative weightings, and performance conditions are referenced to a specific document.

Exhaustivité80/100

All essential basic information, financial details, timeline, and classification are provided. Requirements and evaluation criteria are well-defined. While two documents (XML/ZIP) were not AI-analyzed, their presence indicates a comprehensive tender package.

Équité90/100

The tender exhibits high fairness with a disclosed estimated value, reasonable submission deadlines, and objective, transparent evaluation criteria. E-procurement is enabled, and the qualification requirements, such as experience in designing school buildings, appear generic and not tailored to a specific company.

Aspect pratique75/100

Electronic submission is fully supported, enhancing practicality for bidders. The contract duration and financing information are specified or referenced. However, an explicit contract start date is not provided, and direct document URLs are not listed in the basic information.

Explicit contract start date not provided.
Direct document URLs not listed in basic information.
Cohérence des données95/100

All key fields are populated, and the dates provided for the timeline are logical and consistent. There are no reported suspensions or disputes, indicating high data integrity.

Durabilité30/100

The tender does not explicitly include criteria for green procurement, social aspects, or innovation focus. This represents a missed opportunity to integrate sustainability principles into the procurement process.

Lack of explicit green procurement criteria.
Absence of social aspects.

Points forts

Clear and comprehensive requirements and evaluation criteria.
Strong legal compliance, including EU/national regulations and sanctions checks.
Transparency in value, deadlines, and e-procurement.
Well-structured and consistent data.
Reasonable submission deadline (32 days).

Préoccupations

Absence of explicit sustainability, social, or innovation criteria.
Two documents (XML/ZIP) were not AI-analyzed, potentially hiding details.
Contract start date is not explicitly stated.

Recommandations

1. Integrate sustainability, social, and innovation criteria into future tenders to align with modern procurement best practices.
2. Ensure all tender documents are in easily processable formats for comprehensive analysis.
3. Consider providing an estimated contract start date for better planning by bidders.

Aperçu de la notation IA

Inscrivez-vous pour consulter les exigences et l'analyse complètes

Analyse complète du score de qualité
Répartition détaillée des sous-scores
Aperçu des forces et des préoccupations
Recommandations stratégiques

Aucune carte de crédit requise • Configuration en 2 minutes

Ajouter au Pipeline