Élaboration et supervision d'auteur du projet de construction d'une piste cyclable et piétonne le long de la route régionale P120 Talsi – Stende – Kuldīga, section de 53,36 km à 55,13 km (de Kuldīga à Mežvalde)

This tender exhibits significant deficiencies in transparency and completeness, particularly concerning the absence of evaluation criteria and undisclosed estimated value, despite a clear project description and reasonable deadlines.

While the procedure type, CPV codes, and deadlines are compliant, the tender suffers from critical legal compliance issues due to the undisclosed estimated value, restricted document access, and the explicit absence of specified evaluation criteria, which are fundamental for fair and transparent procurement.

The project description is clear, but the tender critically lacks clarity regarding eligibility, technical, financial, and submission requirements, as well as evaluation criteria. This makes it extremely difficult for potential bidders to understand what is expected and how their proposals will be judged.

Basic information like title, organization, and deadlines are present. However, the tender is significantly incomplete due to the undisclosed estimated value, restricted access to key documents (3 out of 4 failed summary generation), and the absence of detailed requirements and evaluation criteria.

Fairness is severely compromised by the restricted document access, undisclosed estimated value, and the complete absence of specified evaluation criteria. These factors create an opaque bidding environment, making it impossible for bidders to compete on an equal and transparent footing.

The tender supports e-procurement and specifies a clear duration, which are practical aspects. However, the lack of a disclosed estimated value, an explicit contract start date, and fully accessible tender documents reduce its overall practicality for bidders to prepare and plan effectively.

Dates are logical and consistent, and there are no reported disputes or suspensions. However, the absence of the estimated value and detailed requirements/evaluation criteria means that key data fields are not consistently populated, indicating gaps in the tender's structured information.

The tender does not explicitly incorporate any green procurement, social aspects, or innovation focus in its criteria. While the project (pedestrian/bicycle path) has inherent environmental benefits, the tender documentation itself does not leverage these for sustainability considerations.