Réalisation d'un projet d'investissement dans le cadre du budget citoyen : « Construction d'un abri pour conteneurs à déchets sis ul. Budowlanych 44-46 »

This tender for the construction of a waste shelter is generally well-structured, with clear basic information and available documents. However, it lacks crucial details on financial value and evaluation criteria, impacting completeness and fairness.

The tender exhibits good legal compliance with a clear CPV code and specified location. The procedure is not specified, which is a minor omission. No disputes or regulatory issues are flagged, contributing to a decent score. However, the absence of a specified procedure type and potential for short deadlines could be improved.

The tender provides a clear title and description of the construction task. Documents are available and have been analyzed. However, the absence of specified evaluation criteria is a significant drawback in clarity.

Basic information such as title, organization, and deadline is present. However, the estimated value is not disclosed, and contract duration is missing, significantly impacting the completeness of the tender documentation.

The tender is fair in terms of document accessibility and the use of e-procurement. However, the lack of disclosed value and critically, the absence of specified evaluation criteria, raises concerns about objective assessment and fairness to potential bidders.

The tender utilizes e-procurement, which is positive. However, the lack of information on financing and contract start date hinders practical assessment for bidders. The absence of explicit e-submission details might also be a point of concern.

Key fields like title, organization, and deadline are populated. The tender is active with no suspension or disputes. Dates appear logical, and the CPV code is present. The primary consistency issue is the lack of crucial financial and duration data.

The tender does not explicitly mention any green procurement, social aspects, or innovation focus, resulting in a lower score in this category. It is not flagged as EU funded.