Réparation partielle de la surface bitumineuse des routes gérées par la municipalité de Wielka Wieś en 2026

This tender for partial road surface renovation is generally well-structured, with clear technical specifications. However, the absence of disclosed financial value and explicit evaluation criteria raises concerns about completeness and fairness, while the short submission deadline might impact practicality.

The tender adheres to general legal compliance by providing a CPV code, organization details, and a clear procedure. The absence of noted disputes or suspensions contributes to a moderate score. The primary concern is the potentially short submission deadline, which could be legally challenging depending on local regulations, and the lack of a reveal date, impacting procedural transparency.

The description of the work, including the technical steps involved in the partial renovation of asphalt surfaces, is clear and detailed. The presence of technical specifications (STWIOR.docx) further enhances clarity regarding the expected quality and execution. Requirements are well-documented.

Basic information such as the title, organization, and CPV code is present. The submission deadline and duration (implied by 'in 2026') are specified, and several relevant documents are attached. However, the estimated value is not disclosed, and crucial details regarding eligibility, financial capacity, and submission requirements are missing, significantly impacting completeness.

The tender offers full document access and utilizes e-procurement, which are positive indicators of fairness. The criteria for evaluation, however, are not specified, making it difficult for bidders to understand how their proposals will be assessed. The value is not disclosed, which can create an uneven playing field.

The tender is marked as E-Procurement, which is a positive aspect for practical submission. A contract start date is implicitly 'in 2026', but a precise date is missing. The financing information is not provided, and the duration of the contract is not explicitly stated. The deadline might be too short for thorough preparation.

Key fields such as title, reference number, organization, CPV code, and submission deadline are populated. There are no reported disputes or suspensions. Dates provided are logical within the context of a tender for 2026. The consistency is high.

The tender does not explicitly mention any green procurement initiatives, social aspects, or innovation focus. It is also not indicated if it is EU funded. This lack of explicit sustainability criteria results in a moderate score, as the potential for such aspects exists within road construction but is not highlighted.