W5067 Séjours de courte durée pour adultes handicapés intellectuels, personnes autistes et personnes ayant besoin de soutien physique

This tender notice is for a pre-market engagement exercise for a pilot short breaks service. While it provides a clear description of the intended service and encourages provider feedback, it lacks definitive contract details and evaluation criteria, impacting its completeness and practicality.

The notice is in a 'planning' status, indicating it's a pre-procurement stage. The CPV code is appropriate. Deadlines are present, though the submission deadline is relatively short given the 'planning' status. No disputes are noted. The primary concern is the lack of a formal procedure type, which is expected for a planning notice.

The description of the pilot scheme and its objectives is clear. The requirements for providers are outlined in terms of capacity and desired contributions. However, the lack of defined evaluation criteria and the statement that the final contract model is undetermined reduce overall clarity for potential bidders.

Basic information like title, organization, and CPV code is present. The contract duration and indicative start date are provided, though explicitly stated as indicative. The main deficiency is the lack of disclosed estimated value and the absence of accessible tender documents with content.

The tender is open to all providers and encourages feedback, suggesting a fair approach to shaping the final procurement. The value is not disclosed, which is typical for a pre-market engagement. The criteria for feedback are objective, focusing on provider insights. The lack of a formal e-submission process is noted, but this is a pre-market stage.

The submission deadline is short for a pre-market engagement. The contract start date is indicative. The absence of a formal e-submission process and the lack of financing information reduce practicality. The primary purpose is feedback, which is a practical step for the authority.

Key fields such as title, organization, CPV, and deadlines are populated. The status is 'planning', and there are no reported disputes or suspensions. The dates provided are logical within the context of a planning notice, with the caveat that they are indicative.

There is no explicit mention of green procurement, social aspects, or innovation as mandatory requirements. While innovation is encouraged in the description, it is not a formal criterion. The tender is funded by the local authority, not explicitly stated as EU funded.