Création d'une plateforme d'accessibilité interactive (stand numérique) à la cathédrale de la Sainte-Trinité de Liepāja

This tender for an interactive accessibility platform is generally well-structured with clear documentation and requirements. However, the lack of disclosed evaluation criteria and potential for restricted document access slightly impacts fairness and completeness.

The tender adheres to most legal requirements, including a clear procedure, proper CPV code, and active status. Deadlines appear reasonable within the context of the specified timeline. The absence of disclosed disputes further strengthens this aspect.

The description of the interactive accessibility platform and its intended use at the Liepāja Holy Trinity Cathedral is clear. Requirements, particularly technical ones, are documented and specific. However, the lack of explicitly stated evaluation criteria leaves a minor gap in clarity regarding how bids will be assessed.

Most basic information is present, including duration, and numerous required documents are listed and attached. The estimated value is not disclosed, which slightly reduces completeness. While deadlines and contract duration are specified, the absence of explicit evaluation criteria is a notable omission.

The tender generally promotes fairness by offering full document access (though a potential issue is flagged), disclosing the value classification status, and providing objective criteria within the technical specifications. The use of e-procurement also enhances fairness. The primary concern is the lack of specified evaluation criteria, which could lead to subjective assessments.

The tender specifies e-procurement and provides document URLs implicitly through the listed documents. Contract duration and start date are reasonably defined. However, explicit financing information is missing, and the sustainability aspects are not detailed, impacting overall practicality from a bidder's perspective seeking comprehensive project understanding.

Key fields such as title, reference, organization, and deadlines are populated and logically consistent. The tender status is active, and there are no reported disputes, indicating good data integrity. Dates for reveal, submission, and opening are sequential and logical.

The tender does not explicitly mention green procurement, social aspects, innovation, or EU funding. While the project is for a cultural heritage site, specific sustainability targets or requirements are absent, limiting the score in this category.