Construction de toilettes publiques sur la parcelle n° 1242/2 à Krzeszowice, dans le cadre du projet intitulé : « Construction de toilettes publiques »

This tender for the construction of a public toilet in Krzeszowice is generally well-structured, with clear documentation and a defined scope. However, it lacks specific evaluation criteria and details on financing, impacting its overall practicality and completeness.

The tender adheres to general legal compliance by providing a clear procedure, proper CPV code, and active status. The deadline is provided, but its reasonableness for the scope is not explicitly assessed. No disputes are indicated. The procedure is not specified as 'None', which is unusual but not necessarily a violation if it's a standard national procedure.

The description of the public toilet construction is clear, and the requirements are documented through various attached specifications (SWZ, technical descriptions, project documentation). The scope of work is well-defined. However, the absence of specified evaluation criteria leaves a gap in clarity regarding how bids will be assessed.

Most basic information is present, including title, reference, organization, and a clear description. The contract duration is specified. However, the estimated value is not disclosed, which is a significant omission. While many documents are attached, the lack of explicit financial details impacts completeness.

The tender promotes fairness through e-procurement and the availability of all necessary documents for download. The criteria for selection are not explicitly stated, which could be a concern, but the absence of tailored requirements for specific companies suggests a good level of fairness. The value is not disclosed, which is a slight detractor.

The tender utilizes e-procurement, which is positive. However, the contract start date is not specified, and financing information is missing. The deadline, while provided, might be considered short for a construction project of this nature without further context. The lack of explicit e-submission details beyond 'E-Procurement' is a minor point.

Key fields such as title, reference, organization, and deadline are populated. The CPV code is provided, and the dates are logical. There are no indications of suspension or disputes. The tender status is 'active'.

The tender does not explicitly mention any green procurement, social aspects, or innovation focus. It is not indicated as EU funded. This suggests a lack of emphasis on sustainability criteria.