Reconstruction de la rue Lēdmanes, prévoyant une chaussée avec revêtement en béton bitumineux à Ogre, municipalité d'Ogre

This tender for road reconstruction in Ogre is generally well-structured with clear documentation, but lacks disclosed financial value and specific evaluation criteria, impacting completeness and fairness.

The tender adheres to open procedure and provides a CPV code. Deadlines appear reasonable. The primary concern is the lack of explicitly stated evaluation criteria, which could indirectly affect the transparency of the legal process. No disputes are reported.

The description of the works is clear, and essential documents like technical specifications and work assignments are provided. However, the absence of explicit evaluation criteria within the main tender notice reduces overall clarity.

Most basic information is present, including deadlines and duration. However, the estimated value is not disclosed, which is a significant omission. While required documents are listed, the lack of disclosed value impacts the completeness of financial information.

The tender is an open procedure with e-procurement characteristics, promoting fairness. However, the 'Issues: Restricted document access' flag suggests potential limitations in full document access for all parties, and the missing explicit evaluation criteria in the main notice could be perceived as less objective.

The tender utilizes e-procurement, which is positive. However, the 'Issues: No e-submission' flag is contradictory to 'E-Procurement' characteristic and needs clarification. Missing contract duration and financing information also reduce practicality.

Key fields such as title, reference, organization, and deadlines are populated. Dates are logical, and there are no reported suspensions or disputes. The tender status is active.

The tender does not explicitly mention green procurement, social aspects, or innovation. While EU funding is not specified, the absence of these elements leads to a lower score in this category.