Rénovation du plafond de la salle à manger, Manston Primary School, Dennil Road, Manston, Leeds LS15 8SD

This tender for the refurbishment of a dining hall ceiling at Manston Primary School is generally well-structured, with clear basic information and a defined process. However, it lacks specific evaluation criteria and details on sustainability aspects.

The tender appears to comply with general procurement regulations for below-threshold open competitions. Deadlines are specified, and the procedure is outlined. The CPV code is appropriate. No disputes are noted. The primary concern is the lack of a reveal date for submissions, which is a minor procedural oversight.

The description of the works required is clear and concise. The submission requirements and contact information for support are well-documented. However, the absence of specified evaluation criteria leaves potential bidders uncertain about how their submissions will be assessed.

Most basic information is present, including the title, reference, organization, estimated value, and contract duration. The submission deadline and contract start/end dates are provided. However, the lack of content in the tender documents is a significant gap, preventing a full assessment of completeness.

The tender is an open competition, promoting broad participation. The estimated value is disclosed, and the e-submission via Jaggaer portal is a fair practice. The criteria for selection are not explicitly stated, which could be improved for greater transparency, but there are no overt signs of tailored requirements for specific companies.

The requirement for e-submission via the Jaggaer portal is practical. A document URL is provided for the portal. The contract start date is specified. However, information regarding financing is absent, and the short contract duration of one month might limit the pool of potential contractors for complex works.

Key fields such as title, reference, organization, value, and deadlines are populated. There are no reported disputes or suspensions. The dates provided (submission deadline, contract start/end) are logically sequenced.

The tender does not explicitly mention any green procurement, social aspects, or innovation requirements. It is also not indicated as EU funded. This lack of focus on sustainability aspects limits its score in this category.