Achats de faible valeur pour la CLIMATISATION DU GYMNASE KAIŠIAI ALGERD BRAZAUSKAS

This tender for air conditioning installation exhibits good basic information and documentation availability. However, it lacks transparency in evaluation criteria and financial details, and its sustainability considerations are minimal. The short deadline also raises practical concerns.

The tender appears to comply with basic legal requirements, including providing a CPV code and having documentation available. However, the short submission deadline relative to the opening date may be problematic in some jurisdictions. The absence of a stated procedure type beyond 'Open' could indicate a minor procedural oversight.

The tender provides a clear title and description of the works required. The existence of various attached documents suggests detailed specifications are available, though the content of some is not summarized. The primary clarity issue lies in the missing explicit evaluation criteria.

Most essential information is present, such as title, organization, and contract duration. However, the estimated value is not disclosed, which significantly impacts completeness. While 12 documents are listed, the lack of content summaries for several crucial ones hinders a full assessment of completeness.

The tender is marked as 'E-Procurement,' which generally promotes fairness. The requirements are not tailored to specific companies. However, the lack of disclosed estimated value and explicit, objectively defined evaluation criteria could potentially reduce fairness by obscuring the decision-making process.

The use of e-procurement is positive. However, the submission deadline of April 3rd, 2026, for a tender posted around late March 2026, offers a very short window for bidders to prepare and submit proposals, impacting practicality. The lack of disclosed financing information and contract start date adds to this.

Key fields such as title, organization, CPV code, and deadlines are populated logically. The status 'active' aligns with an upcoming submission deadline. There are no indications of disputes or suspensions. The dates provided are consistent.

The tender lacks any explicit mention or inclusion of green procurement criteria, social aspects, or innovation. There is no indication of EU funding. This is a significant gap in aligning with modern procurement standards.