Extension de capacité Quantum du data warehouse

This tender for data storage expansion is generally well-structured, with clear documentation and a defined process. However, the absence of disclosed financial value and specific evaluation criteria presents moderate concerns regarding transparency and completeness.

The tender adheres to the open procedure (2014/24/ES) and specifies a relevant CPV code. Deadlines are provided, and the organization is a public body. No immediate legal disputes or regulatory non-compliance are apparent from the provided data. The primary concern is the lack of a disclosed estimated value, which can impact the perception of compliance with value thresholds.

The tender title and CPV code are clear. While the description states 'See procurement documents,' the presence of 12 documents, including technical specifications and contract terms, suggests that detailed requirements are available. The main clarity issue is the absence of explicitly stated evaluation criteria within the summary information.

Most basic information is present, including title, reference, organization, and deadlines. The contract duration is specified. However, the estimated financial value is not disclosed, which is a significant omission for completeness. The availability of 12 documents indicates a good level of detail is provided within the procurement package.

The tender is an open procedure, promoting broad participation. The use of e-procurement is a positive aspect. Requirements are stated to be in the procurement documents, which are accessible. The lack of disclosed financial value could be a minor concern for some bidders, but overall, the process appears objective and fair, with no obvious tailoring to specific companies.

The tender utilizes e-procurement, which is practical. A contract start date is not explicitly mentioned, but the contract duration is given. Financing information is not detailed. The submission deadline is provided. The primary practicality concern is the lack of explicit information on financing.

Key fields such as title, reference, organization, and deadlines are populated. The tender status is 'active,' and there are no reported disputes or suspensions. Dates are logical, with the opening date following the submission deadline. The CPV code is provided and relevant.

The tender is marked as 'EU Funded,' which often implies adherence to certain standards. However, there is no explicit mention of green procurement, social aspects, or innovation within the provided summary information. This suggests a moderate focus on sustainability aspects.