2026­ESO­213 Clés

This tender for keys is generally well-structured, with most basic information available and a fair process indicated through e-procurement. However, it lacks detailed evaluation criteria and specific social or innovation elements, impacting its overall quality.

The tender appears to comply with general legal requirements, including the use of CPV codes and the indication of EU funding. Deadlines seem reasonable given the contract duration and value. No disputes are noted. The procedure is stated as 'None', which is unusual but might be covered by the 'Derybos su išankstiniu kvietimu dalyvauti konkurse ir (arba) konkursas su derybomis' type.

While the core tender details and financial information are clear, the absence of specified evaluation criteria and detailed technical capability requirements makes it difficult for potential bidders to fully understand the assessment framework. The description is minimal. Many attached documents are referenced without full content extraction.

Most basic information such as title, reference, organization, estimated value, and deadlines are present. A substantial number of documents are attached, providing some detail. However, crucial eligibility, technical, financial, and submission requirements are explicitly marked as not provided, significantly impacting completeness.

The tender utilizes e-procurement, which promotes fairness. The value is disclosed, and the deadlines appear reasonable. There are no explicit requirements tailored to specific companies. The main concern is the lack of disclosed evaluation criteria, which could lead to subjective assessments if not adequately addressed in the provided documents.

The tender is marked as 'E-Procurement', suggesting electronic submission. Document URLs are not explicitly provided but implied through the document list. The contract start date is not specified. Financing information is absent, and the duration is 38 months, which is provided.

Key fields like title, reference, organization, value, and deadlines are populated. There are no recorded disputes or suspensions. Dates provided are logical within the context of a tender. The contract duration is clearly specified.

The tender mentions 'Green Procurement Requirements' in document 2.1. However, there is no explicit mention of social aspects or innovation as mandatory requirements, limiting the sustainability score. The focus seems to be on standard procurement.