Développement de la coopération avec les professionnels lituaniens à l'étranger (EIM)

This tender for business and management consulting services is generally well-structured with clear documentation, but lacks specific evaluation criteria and detailed financial information. The e-procurement aspect is positive, though the absence of explicit sustainability criteria limits its score in that category.

The tender appears to comply with general procurement regulations, including the use of a proper CPV code and an open procedure. Deadlines are provided, though the submission deadline might be considered short by some. No disputes are indicated. The procedure is described as 'None (Code: OPEN)', which is slightly ambiguous but likely refers to a standard open procedure.

The title and description are clear, and the CPV code is specified. While the AI-extracted requirements sections are empty, the presence of 12 documents suggests that detailed requirements are likely contained within them. However, the absence of explicitly stated evaluation criteria is a significant clarity issue.

Most basic information is present, including the organization, title, reference number, and contract duration. The estimated value is not disclosed, which is a significant omission. All 12 documents are listed, indicating a comprehensive set of tender documents is available, though their content is not fully summarized by the AI.

The tender utilizes e-procurement, which promotes fairness. The value is not disclosed, which can be a concern for fairness. However, there are no apparent requirements tailored to specific companies, and the criteria, while not explicitly stated, are expected to be objective given the nature of the service. Full document access is implied by the listing of 12 documents.

The tender is marked as 'E-Procurement', suggesting e-submission is likely. However, the AI notes 'No e-submission' as an issue, which is contradictory and needs clarification. The contract start date is not specified. Financing information is not detailed, and the duration is provided.

Key fields such as title, reference, organization, and deadlines are populated. There are no indications of suspension or disputes. The dates provided (submission deadline, opening date, tender valid) are logically sequenced.

The tender is marked as 'EU Funded', which often implies adherence to certain standards. However, there are no explicit mentions of green procurement, social aspects, or innovation within the provided information, leading to a moderate score in this category.