Construction d'un parc de patins à roulettes, de skateboard et de BMX dans la vallée de Joniniai à Jonava

This tender for a sports park construction is generally well-structured with clear basic information and EU funding. However, it lacks detailed requirements and evaluation criteria, impacting completeness and fairness.

The tender adheres to EU procurement directives and has a clear CPV code. Deadlines are provided, though the submission deadline might be considered short. No disputes are reported. The primary concern is the lack of specified evaluation criteria, which is a significant omission in legal compliance.

The title and description clearly indicate the subject of the procurement. The presence of a tender structure document suggests a defined submission format. However, the absence of detailed eligibility, technical, financial, and submission requirements makes the overall clarity of what is expected from bidders moderate.

Basic information such as title, reference, organization, estimated value, and contract duration are present. However, critical sections like mandatory exclusion grounds, eligibility, technical, financial, and submission requirements are explicitly marked as 'No information provided'. This significantly impacts the completeness of the tender documentation.

The tender is open and EU-funded, suggesting a degree of fairness. The estimated value is disclosed, and the procedure is standard. However, the complete lack of specified evaluation criteria and detailed requirements for bidders makes it difficult to assess objectivity and could lead to perceived unfairness in the selection process.

The tender is marked as 'E-Procurement', which is positive for submission practicality. A contract duration of 6 months is specified. However, the absence of a contract start date and financing information limits the practical assessment for potential bidders.

Key fields such as title, reference, organization, value, and deadlines are populated. The tender status is 'active' and no disputes are reported. Dates are logically presented. The consistency is high, with no apparent contradictions within the provided information.

The tender is EU funded, which often implies adherence to certain standards. However, there are no explicit mentions of green procurement, social aspects, or innovation within the provided information, resulting in a low score for sustainability.