Travaux de reconstruction d'un ouvrage d'ingénierie à usage divers, situé Liepų g. 16, Zabieliškio k., Kėdainiai r.

This tender for reconstruction works is generally well-structured but lacks crucial details regarding evaluation criteria and financial aspects, impacting its overall completeness and clarity.

The tender adheres to EU procurement directives (2014/24/ES) and uses a proper CPV code. Deadlines are present, and the procedure is open. No disputes are reported. However, the absence of a reveal date for submissions is a minor procedural oversight.

The description of the works is clear, and the CPV code is specified. However, the lack of specified evaluation criteria makes it difficult for bidders to understand how their submissions will be assessed, reducing overall clarity.

Basic information such as title, organization, and deadlines are present. The contract duration is specified. However, the estimated value is not disclosed, and crucial details like eligibility, technical, financial, and submission requirements are missing from the provided text, significantly impacting completeness.

The tender is an open procedure, promoting broad participation. E-procurement is indicated, which enhances transparency. However, the lack of disclosed estimated value and unspecified evaluation criteria could be perceived as less fair, as bidders may not fully understand the scope or how they will be judged.

The tender is active and has a submission deadline. E-procurement is mentioned, suggesting electronic submission. However, the contract start date is not specified, and financing information is absent. The lack of detailed requirements in the AI-extracted section also hinders practical preparation.

Key fields like title, reference, organization, and deadlines are populated. The CPV code and NUTS code are present. No disputes or suspensions are reported, and the dates provided are logical. The tender status is active.

There is no explicit mention of green procurement, social aspects, or innovation within the tender details. It is also not indicated if the project is EU funded, suggesting a lack of focus on sustainability criteria.