RÉNOVATION D'UN IMMEUBLE D'HABITATION COLLECTIVE (R. JUKNEVIČIAUS G. 5, MARIJAMPOLĖ)

This tender for construction supervision services is generally well-structured, with clear documentation and a standard open procedure. However, the lack of disclosed financial value and specific evaluation criteria are notable omissions.

The tender follows a standard open procedure (2014/24/ES) and includes essential documents like general and special conditions, and a draft contract. The CPV code is appropriate. The primary concern is the lack of a specified reveal date for submissions, which is a procedural oversight. Deadlines appear reasonable given the scope.

The title and description are clear, specifying the location and nature of the renovation. Key documents like general and special conditions, and the contract draft are provided, contributing to clarity. However, the absence of explicit evaluation criteria leaves a gap in understanding how bids will be assessed.

Most essential information is present, including the title, reference, organization, CPV code, and contract duration. However, the estimated value is not disclosed, which is a significant omission for potential bidders. The submission deadline is provided.

The tender uses a standard open procedure and e-procurement, promoting fairness. All required documents are accessible. The lack of disclosed financial value and specific evaluation criteria could be perceived as a minor fairness concern, as it limits full transparency for bidders. No requirements appear tailored to specific companies.

The tender is marked as 'E-Procurement', suggesting electronic submission is possible. However, the 'Issues' section explicitly states 'No e-submission', creating a contradiction. The contract start date is not specified, and financing information is absent. The duration is clear.

Key fields such as title, reference, organization, CPV, and deadlines are populated. The status is 'active', and there are no reported disputes or suspensions. Dates are logically presented, with the opening date following the submission deadline.

The tender is marked as 'EU Funded', which often implies adherence to certain standards. However, there are no explicit mentions of green procurement, social aspects, or innovation within the provided information, limiting its sustainability score.